GOUTAM TARINI v. STATE OF ODISHA
Court: High Court of Orissa
Bench: MR. JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Orissa judgment dated 2025-12-23. GOUTAM TARINI v. STATE OF ODISHA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 14507 of 2025 Goutam Tarini …. Petitioner Mr. G. K. Nayak, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. S. N. Das, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH ORDER 23. 12. 2025 Order No. 01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The Petitioner is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with G. R. Case No. 203 of 2024 pending on the file of learned J. M. F. C. , Aska arising out of Gangapur P. S. Case No. 70 of 2024 for commission of offences punishable under Sections 272/273/120-B of IPC read with Section 52(a) of the Orissa Excise Act. 3. Taking into account the nature of allegations and the antecedents, this Court is not inclined to entertain the prayer for pre-arrest bail. However, ABLAPL is disposed of with the observation that the Petitioner may surrender before the learned J. M. F. C. , Aska in connection with the aforementioned case within one month from today. 4.
In the event of his surrender and motion for bail, the application for bail shall be considered by the learned J. M. F. C. , Aska on merits in accordance with law in the first hour of the day. In the event of rejection of the prayer for bail by the learned J. M. F. C. , Aska, the Petitioner is at liberty to move the higher forum for bail in the second hour on the same day. 5. On being so moved, the higher forum is requested to make an endeavour to dispose of the bail application of the Petitioner on the same day on merit in accordance with law. The case diary shall be made available to the concerned courts to facilitate disposal of the bail application of the Petitioner and learned J. M. F. C. , Aska is called upon to transmit the case record to the higher forum in the second hour expeditiously in the event of rejection of such bail application. 6. Ground of parity, if any, may be considered by the learned court below. 7.
Learned court in seisin is requested to verify the criminal antecedents of the Petitioner. If it comes to fore that the Petitioner has more than three criminal antecedents of similar nature, this order shall not be given effect to. 8. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of. Signature Not Verified (V. NARASINGH) Digitally Signed Signed by: PRADEEP KUMAR SWAINPKS Judge Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 24-Dec-2025 10:46:17
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.