ZV Chuishung v. State of Manipur and 2 Ors
Court: High Court of Manipur
Bench: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.GUNESHWAR SHARMA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Manipur judgment dated 2026-02-08. ZV Chuishung v. State of Manipur and 2 Ors. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Digitally signed NINGOM by NINGOMBAM BAM VICTORIA Date: 2026. 02. 10 Item No. 37 VICTORIA 15:03:42 +05'30' IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL WP(C) No. 514 of 2025 ZV Chuishung. …Petitioner - Versus - State of Manipur & 2 Ors. …Respondents B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA O R D E R 09-02-2026 [1] Present Mr. T. Mark Khapai, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Niranjan Sanasam, learned Government Advocate for the State respondent through video conferencing. [2] The effort of mediation is unsuccessful. [3] By the present petition, the petitioner approached this Court for directions to the respondents for making payment of compensation of Zimik th th Resort Kachi which was destroyed in the Manipur violence from 12 to 14 of June, 2023 and also to dispose of the representation dated 07-05-2025 submitted by the petitioner to the Deputy Commissioner, Kangpokpi.
The prayer is reproduced below:— “In the premises aforesaid, it is therefore, most respectfully prayed that Your Lordship may graciously be pleased to ---i) direct the respondents for making payment of the assessed values of properties of the Zimik Resort Kachi which has been burnt and dismantled during the incident of Meiteis and Kukis ethnic clash on 12-14. 06. 2023. ii) direct the Respondents to dispose of the representation dated 07. 05. 2025 and to compensate the remaining assessed amount Rs. 40,00,000/- (Rupees Forty Lakhs) only. ANNEXURE-A/10. iii) pass any such further order or direction as to your Lordship may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case; iv) pay the cost. ” [4] At this stage, Mr. T. Mark Khapai, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the writ petition may be disposed of by directing the Deputy Commissioner, Kangpokpi to consider the representation dated 07- 05-2025 and pass a speaking order as per law within a stipulated time.
[5] Mr. Niranjan Sanasam, learned Government Advocate for the State respondents, submits that the writ petition may be disposed of as suggested by the learned counsel for the petitioner. [6] Recording the submissions made at the Bar, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the Deputy Commissioner, Kangpokpi to dispose of the representation dated 07-05-2025 submitted by the petitioner by a speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. [7] It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merit of the case. [8] Interim order, if any, merges with the final order. JUDGE Victoria
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.