Rayala Upender Rao v. The State of Telangana And 3 Others
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-01-22. Rayala Upender Rao v. The State of Telangana And 3 Others. Read the judgment and case details...
Judgment text
s2e6 I ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENry SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C. V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 34985 OF 2022 Between: Rayala Upender Rao, Sio. Late Satyanarayana, Aged aboul 42 years, Occ Agriculture, Rl/o. Chimiryala Village, Kodada Mandal, Suryapet District ... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary (Revenue), Secretariat, BRK Bhavan, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, Suryapet District at Suryapet 3 The Tahsildar, Kodada Mandal, Suryapet District. 4 Ravala Purnachander Rao @ Purnaiah, S/o. Srinivasa Rao, Aged about 32 'l-28, yedrs, occ. Agriculture, Ryo. Tl. No. Chimiryala Village, Kodada Mandal, Suryapet District ...
RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus to declare the succession issued by the 3rd Respondent - Tahsildar in favour of the 4th Respondent in respect of land admeasuring Ac. 2-00 gts. , in Sy. No. 90/E3 based upon the Will Deed dated 2210812016 of Smt. Rayala Ademma as the same was made without having any jurisdiction and issued without conducting any enquiry by giving any notic. e to the Petitioner and other family members as the same is also contrary to the provisions of The Telangana Rights in Land and Pattedar Passbooks Act, 2020(Act No. 9 of 2020) and violative of Article 14, 300-A of the Constitution of lndia and consequently set-a-side the mutation proceedings and pattedar passbook bearing Khata No. 60728 in the name of 4th Respondent being nullity.
IA i'l oF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd Respondent - District Collector to consider the representation of I the Petitioner dated 2210812022 by giving an opportunity of personal hearing of the Petitioner pending disposal of the above writ petition. tA NO: 2 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the entries in the revenue records and pattedar passbook bearing Khata No. 60728 issued in the name of 4th Respondent in respect of the land adm. Ac. 2-00 gts. , in Sy. No. 90/E3 of Chirmiryala Village, Kodad Mandal, Suryapet District pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI LOKIREV PREETHAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.
1 to 3: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel forthe Respondent No. 4: SRI P. NARENDRA REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER // (^ I . ', THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE C. V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PET ITION No. 34985 of 2022 ORDER: Learned counser for the pedtioner has addressed a Ietter dated 20. 01. 2025 to the Regisrry seeking permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with a liberry to the petitioner to I avail the remedies available in law. 2. Permission as sought for is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the present Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. No costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous application s, if any, shall stand closed. SD/. T. JAYASREE t ASSI REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// CTION To, OFFICER 1. One CC to SRt LOKTREV PREETHAM REDDY, Advocate IOPUCI 2. One CC to SRt P. NARENDRA REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] t REVENUE, Hish court for the state of retans€na lff"g8:otffiFoR at 4.
Two CD Copies BSR/BSK (t- I HIGH COURT DATED: 2210112025 1il E :r 14 r 2 0 rE0 20fi ;a ORDER '?. + WP. No. 34985 of 2022 ':,/i^ .. -a PIi,1'CH I I DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITTON AS WITHDRAWN, WITHOUT COSTS ? + 7T+'>{. 1(s{LL>
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.