Kudikala Ram Babu v. The State of Telangana

Court: High Court for State of Telangana

Bench: B.VIJAYSEN REDDY

Judgment date: 2026-04-17

Case summary

High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2026-04-17. Kudikala Ram Babu v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

\ [ 3183 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WP. Nos. 11006 11009 AND 1'1015 0F 2026 WP NO: 11006 OF 2026 Between: JETTABOINA KUMARASWAMY, S/o. Late J. Uppalaiah, Aged about 55 Years, Occ: Mason, R/o. H. No. 11-3-266140lBl'llN15, Srinivasanagar, Vaarasiguda, Secunderabad. ... PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF TELANGANA, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, D-Block, 4th Floor Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad-500022. 2. COLLECTOR & DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, Hanumakonda District. 3. TAHSILDAR & JOINT SUB REGISTRAR, Atmakur Mandal, Hanumakonda District. 4. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL STAMPS & REGISTRATION TELANGANA, Registration Bhavan,4th & 5h Floor, Nizamshahi Road, Osmangunj, M. J. Market, Hyderabad-500001 . 5. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR (STAMPS & REGISTRATIONS), Hanumakonda District. ...

RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to ISSUE an order or orders more particularly one in the nature of writ of GERTIoRARI or any other appropriate writ or writs, order or orders calling for records in Proceedings vide File No. Dl/460/2025 and Set-aside the lmpugned orders dt. 2310812025 as they are arbitrary, illegal and contrary to the provisions of Telangana lihu Bharathi (Records of Rights in Land) Act, 2025 l. A. NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circur rstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be ptr-. rsed to SUSPEND the operation of lmpugned Order Dated 2310812025 passed by F espondent No. 2 vide Proceedings in File No.

D1/460/2025 pending disposal of the abcr r Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SUJITH JAISWAL Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE (STAMPS { REGISTRATION) WP NO: 11009 OF 2026 Between: KUDIKALA SUJITH KUMAR, S/o. K. Ram Babu, aged 4i rears, Occ. Employee R:/o. H. No. 1-9-250/9/9126, EWS2, MCH 61, Parsigutta F amnagar, Hyderabad, Telangana State. Rep by his Attomey, ARRA RAMEI] 1, S/o. Bala Veeraiah, Aged 56 years, Occ. Business, H. No. '12-46, Big Bazar. I :makonda Mandalam, Nizamabad District, Telangana State. PETITIONER AND 1 . THE STATE OF TELANGANA, Rep by its Principi: Secretary, Revenue Department, D-Block, 4th Floor Telangana Secretariat, H /, erabad-500022 2. COLLECTOR & DISTRICT MAGTSTRATE, Hanumakond I District. 3. TAHSILDAR & JOINT SUB REGTSTRAR, Atmakur \ andat, Hanumakonda District. 4. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL STAMPS & REGISTII \TION TELANGANA, Registration Bhavan, 4th & sth, Floor, Nizamshahi Road, (l ;manguni, M. J. Market, Hyderabad-500001 . 5.

THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR (STAMPS & REG|STRA1 ONS), Hanumakonda District. ... RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndii praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High c < urt may be pleased to lssuE an order or orders more particularly one in the nature of \ /rit of cERTioRARI or any other appropriate writ or Writs, order or orders calling for ecords proceedings in vide File No. D1146212025 and Set-aside the lmpugned Order; dt. 23. 08. 2025 as they are arbitrary, illegal and contrary to the provisions of Telangana Bhu Bharathi (Records of Rights in Land) Act, 2025. l. A. NO: 'l OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To SUSPEND the operation of lmpugned Order Dated 23. 08. 2025 passed by Respondent No. 2 vide Proceedings in File No. D1/46212O25 pending disposal of the above Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SUJITH JAISWAL Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR STAMPS & REGTSTRATION WP NO: 11015 OF 2026: Between: Kudikala Ram Babu, S/o. Dasharatham, aged 75 years, Occ. Retd-Employee, R/o. H. No. 1-9-25O1919126, EWS2, MCH 61, East Parsigutta, Ramnagar, Hyderabad, Telangana State. Rep by his Attorney, Ana Ramesh, S/o. Bala Veeraiah, Aged 56 years, Occ. Business, H. No. 12-46, Big Bazar, Domakonda Mandalam, Nizamabad District, Telangana State. ... PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, D- Biock, 4th Floor Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad-500022 2. Collector and District Magistrate, Hanumakonda District. 3. Tahsildar and Joint Sub Regiskar, Atmakur Mandal, Hanumakonda District. 4. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL STAMPS and REGISTRATION TELANGANA, Registration Bhavan, 4th and sth Floor, Nizamshahi Road, Osmangunj, M. J. Market, Hyderabad-50000 1. 5. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR (STAMPS and REGISTRATIONS), Hanumakonda District.

... RESPONDENTS Petition under Anide 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto ISSUE an order or orders more particularly one in the nature of Writ of CERTIORARI or any other appropriate Writ or Writs, Order or Orders calling for records in Proceedings vide File No. D1l461l2O25 and Set-aside the lmpugned Orders dt. 23. 08. 2025 as they are arbitrary, illegal and contrary to the provisions of Telangana lhu Bharathi (Records of Rights in Land) Act, 2025. l. A. NO: 1OF 2026 Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circL r rstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be leased To SUSPEND the operation of lmpugned Order Dated 23. 08. 2025 vid: Proceedings in file No. D1146112025 passed by Respondent No. 2 pending disprx al of the above Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SUJITH JAISWAL Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE (STAMPS i , REGISTRATION) The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER I i I (- IN THE HTGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT P ITION Nos. 11OO 11OO9 and 1101 of 2()26 Dated. L7. o4. 2(J26 Between lettaboina Kumaraswamy and others .. PETITIONERS And The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Hyderabad and others. ... RESPONDENTS COMMON ORDER: Mr. Sujith Jaiswal, learned counsel for the petitioners, after arguing for sufficient length of time, requested that the writ petitions may be disposed of directing the trial Court to dispose of the suit. O. S. No. 65 of 2024, without being influenced by any observations made in the impugned order dated 23. 08. 2025. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that a suit in O. S. No.

65 of 2024, has been filed by the petitioners, on the file of the Principal Senior Civil ludge, Hanumakonda, for injunction and by way of abundant caution, the writ petitions are filed challenging the impugned order dated 23. 08. 2025 so as to ensure that the trial Court will not be influenced by the observations made in the ( I impugned order dated 23. 08. 2025. It is subm t ed that the proceedings before the revenue authorities are sumn ary in nature and cannot form the basis for deciding title and ar y findings or observations made therein shall not cause any prr judice to the petitioners. 3. Learned Assistant Government pleader or Revenue submitted that the father of the petitioner r,l r. 1, namely, J. Uppalaiah, was, admittedly. assigned Ac. 10. OO rntas of 3 land under political sufferer category. The impugned orde- "eveals that a categorical finding has been given that Ac. 5. O0 gur tas was sold vide sale deed bearing document No. 2973/1973 date J OS. 12.

1973 and that third parties are in physical possession of he remaining extent of the land in sy. No. 41. 4. In the circumstances, this Court is not inclineo to make any observations suffice to mention that any observal i rns made by revenue authorities are not conclusive and shall ,orm nol the sole basis for deciding the suit by the trial Court. The writ petitions are accordingly dispo: ed of. The miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stan,l closed. There shall be no order as costs. SD/- AI- MED ABDULLA KHAN At slsTANT BEGISTRAR /ffRUE COPY// (2- SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, The Star of Telangana, D-Block, 4th Floor Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad-500022 2. Collector and District Magistrate, Hanumakonda District w 3. Tahsildar and Joint sub Registrar, Atmakur Mandar, Hanumakonda District. 4. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL STAMPS and REGISTRATION TELANGANA, Registration Bhavan, 4th and 5th Floor, Nizamshahi Road, Osmangunj, M. J.

Market, Hyderabad-500001. 5. THE \ DlsrRlcr REGTSTRAR (srAMps and REGTsTRATTONS), Hanumakonda District. 6. One CC to SRI SUJTTH JA|SWAL, Advocate tOpUCl 7. Two ccs to GP FoR srAMps AND REG|srRATtoN High court for the state of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] 8. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] 9. Two CD Copies t"* ,@- Vu-+, I I CC TODAY HIGH COURT DATED: 1710412026 lHE S la R ( o ,,1' <, t I 2 2 API] 2026 i-: Qt -,1. COMMON ORDER :.. t4 _t-' WP. Nos. l1006, 11009 & 11015 OF 2026 DISPOSING OF ALL THE WRIT PETITIC)]. IS WITHOUT COSTS i I

Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.