Th Beshang v. State of Manipur and 2 others
Court: High Court of Manipur
Bench: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.GUNESHWAR SHARMA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Manipur judgment dated 2025-09-18. Th Beshang v. State of Manipur and 2 others. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Item No. 11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL WP(C) No. 747 of 2025 Th. Beshang ….. Petitioner/s - Versus – State of Manipur & 2 Ors. .... Respondent/s BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA Order 19. 09. 2025 [1] Heard Mr. Serto T Kom, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S. Niranjan, learned G. A. for the State respondent. [2] By the present writ petition, the petitioner prays for a limited prayer for directing respondent No. 2 i. e. The Collector (Land Acquisition)/Deputy Commissioner, Kakching District, Manipur to consider and dispose of the representation dated 16. 04. 2025 submitted by the petitioner by a speaking order. [3] In the representation submitted by the petitioner, the petitioner who is chief of Thamlapokpi/Thamnapokpi village near Pallel prays for releasing compensation from the land acquired under his patta land. [4] It is submitted that the representation is still pending with respondent No. 2 i. e.
Collector (Land Acquisition)/Deputy Commissioner, Kakching District, Manipur. [5] It is prayed that writ petition may be disposed of by directing respondent No. 2 to consider and pass a speaking order to the pending representation within the stipulated time. [6] Mr. S. Niranjan, learned G. A. for the State respondent, has no objection in passing an innocuous order. [7] Considering the submissions made at the bar and nature of relief prayed for in the writ petition, the present writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent No. 2 i. e. Collector (Land Acquisition)/Deputy Commissioner, Kakching District, Manipur to consider and pass a speaking order to the pending representation dated 16. 04. 2025 submitted by the petitioner herein within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. [8] With this observation, writ petition is disposed of. [9] This Court does not express any opinion on the merit of the case.
[10] Registry is directed to furnish a copy of the order to the Deputy Commissioner, Kakching for information. JUDGE Kh. Joshua Maring
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.