SRI S.V.LAKSHMANA v. SHRI S.B.VASTHRA MUTH, IAS
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,E.S.INDIRESH
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2020-02-28. SRI S.V.LAKSHMANA v. SHRI S.B.VASTHRA MUTH, IAS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU TH DATED THIS THE 28 DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE E. S. INDIRESH C. C. C. No. 1399/2019 (CIVIL) BETWEEN: SRI. S. V. LAKSHMANA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS S/O VENKATE GOWDA RESIDING AT NO 96/A, III CROSS, HOYSALA ROAD BRINDAVAN NAGAR BANGALORE – 560 019 PRESENTLY WORKING AS ATTENDER, V. V. PURAM LAW COLLEGE, K. R. ROAD V V PURAM, BANGALORE – 560 004. ... COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. VIVEKANANDA T. P, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SHRI. S. B. VASTHRA MUTH, IAS MAJOR FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE COMPLAINANT PRINCIPAL SECRETARY/SECRETARY GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF LAW VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU – 560 001. 2. SHRI. K. R. RAMESH BABU MAJOR FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE COMPLAINANT, JOINT DIRECTOR, REGIONAL OFFICE DEPARTMENT OF COLLEGIATE EUDCATION NO. 5, KALIDASA ROAD, BANGALORE – 560 009. …RESPONDENTS/ACCUSED (BY SRI. B. V.
KRISHNA, AGA) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, PRAYING TO TAKE COGNIZANCE OF WILLFUL DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER DATED:11. 04. 2018 IN W. P. NO. 17843/2016 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON’BLE COURT AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED FOR THE WILLFUL DISOBEDIENCE FO THE COURT ORDER. THIS CCC COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ARAVIND KUMAR J, MADE THE FOLLOWING: O R D E R This contempt proceedings has been initiated alleging there has been willful disobedience of the order dated 11. 04. 2018 passed in W. P. No. 17843/2016 by the respondent. Direction which came to be issued in the writ petition was to the effect that respondents should consider the case of the petitioner and to pass appropriate order with regard to considering the case of petitioner as “Attender” instead of “Peon”. 2.
Today, learned Government Advocate has filed the affidavit of second respondent whereunder it is stated that claim of the petitioner, as forwarded under the proposal submitted by the college, has been examined and for the reasons indicated in the order dated 25. 02. 2020 (Document No. 1) claim of the petitioner has been rejected. In that view of the matter, we are not inclined to continue the present proceedings and reserving liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order dated 25. 02. 2020, this contempt petition stands dropped. SD/- JUDGE SD/- JUDGE DR
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Archive: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.