PRASANTHKUMAR K.P. v. STATE OF KERALA
Court: High Court of Kerala
Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Kerala judgment dated 2024-03-12. PRASANTHKUMAR K.P. v. STATE OF KERALA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C. P. TUESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 22ND PHALGUNA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 6599 OF 2024 PETITIONER :- PRASANTHKUMAR K. P. , AGED 38 YEARS S/O LATE M ACHUTHAPRAKASAN, RESIDING AT 'ACHUDEVIKRIPA', POKKUNNI, VADVANNUR P. O. , CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. , PIN – 678504 BY ADVS. SAJAN VARGHEESE K. LIJU. M. P RESPONDENTS :- 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT ANNEXE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. , PIN – 695001 2 THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. , PIN – 695014 3 THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION CIVIL STATION, PALAKKAD. , PIN – 678001 4 THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER MUNCIPAL COMPLEX, ROBINSON ROAD, PALAKKAD . , PIN – 678001 5 THE MANAGER POLACHIRACKAL HIGH SCHOOL, PADAGIRI P. O. , NELLIAMPATHY, NENMARA, PALAKKAD. , PIN – 678509 6 THE HEADMISTRESS POLACHIRACKAL HIGH SCHOOL, PADAGIRI P. O.
, NELLIAMPATHY, NENMARA, PALAKKAD. , PIN - 678509 SMT. NISHA BOSE, SR. GP WP(C) NO. 6599 OF 2024 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12. 03. 2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO. 6599 OF 2024 JUDGMENT The petitioner has preferred Ext. P7 representation before the first respondent, claiming approval and also regularisation. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no orders have been passed on representation so far, and seeks a direction to the first respondent to dispose of the same. 2. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the first respondent to take up Ext. P7 and pass orders in accordance with law, with notice to the petitioner and other affected parties, if any and after affording an opportunity of hearing to them, within an outer time limit of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
It will be open to the petitioner to produce such documents to substantiate the contentions, which will be adverted to by the first respondent while considering the representation. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- MOHAMMED NIAS C. P. JUDGE SMA NO. 6599 OF 2024 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 6599/2024 PETITIONER EXHIBITS :- TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 30-04-2018. TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 20- 08-2018 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT. TRUE COPY OF THE REMINDER DATED 27-09-2021 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 26-10-2022 ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 01-11-2022 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER IN ANSWER TO EXHIBIT P4. TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH RESPONDENT DATED 09-12-2022. TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF REPRESENTATION DATED 26. 02.
24 SUBMITTED TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT THROUGH PROPER CHANNEL TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE HEADMISTRESS TO THE PETITIONER DATED 26. 02. 24.
Source: High Court of Kerala. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.