Skip to main content
LawSphereX

VIJAYRAM JATAV v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2024-01-08. VIJAYRAM JATAV v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND RAMESH PHADKE th ON THE 8 OF JANUARY, 2024 WRIT PETITION No. 23015 of 2021 BETWEEN:- VIJAYRAM JATAV S/O SHOBHARAM JATAV, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCCUPATION: RETIRED, R/O NEW SHARMA COLONY CHETRAM PANDIT KE PAS, NADI PAR TAL MORAR, DISTRICT GWALIOR (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... PETITIONER (BY SHRI SARVESH SINGH - ADVOCATE ) AND 1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FOREST DEPARTMENT, VALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, DISTRICT GWALIOR (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI S. S. KUSHWAHA - GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE ) This petition coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the following: ORDER The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioner challenging inaction on the part of respondent No.

2 - Collector, District Gwalior, whereby he is not recovering the money in accordance with the RRC (Annexure P/1) issued by the Controlling Authority, Office of the Assistant Labour Commissioner, Gwalior, under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Signature Not Verified Signed by: ASHISH PAWAR Signing time: 09-01-2024 11:09:35 AM 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner made a limited prayer that in case directions are issued to respondent No. 2-Collector, District Gwalior to execute the pending RRC Annexure P/1 in accordance with law, in a time bound manner, his grievance would be redressed. 3. On the other hand, innocuous prayer so made by counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by learned counsel for the respondents. 4. Looking to the limited prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner, t h e petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.

2-Collector, District Gwalior to execute the pending RRC (Annexure P/1) within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order in accordance with law. 5. With the aforesaid direction, petition is disposed of. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Certified copy as per rules. (MILIND RAMESH PHADKE) JUDGE Pawar Signature Not Verified Signed by: ASHISH PAWAR Signing time: 09-01-2024 11:09:35 AM

Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.