Skip to main content
LawSphereX

KALASI DEVI v. THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER

Court: High Court of Himachal Pradesh

Bench: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTSNA REWAL DUA

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Himachal Pradesh judgment dated 2026-01-05. KALASI DEVI v. THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 21150 of 2025 Decided on: 05. 01. 2026 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Kalasi Devi ….. Petitioner Versus State of H. P. and another ..... Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Gurmeet Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Y. P. S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Y. P. S. Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 3. Petitioner’s grievance is that her representation dated 15. 12. 2025 (Annexure P-2) seeking applicability of 2 Mohit Sharma & Anr. Versus State of H.

P. & Ors. has not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. CWP No. 1638 of 2024, decided on 29. 11. 2024 the petitioner would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer. 4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner dated 15. 12. 2025 (Annexure P-2) in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment in the case of Mohit 2 Sharma within a period of six weeks from today.

The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua January 05, 2026 Judge yogesh

Source: High Court of Himachal Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.