Mr.M.Padma Rao v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: T.VINOD KUMAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-12-15. Mr.M.Padma Rao v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY ,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 425. 9 OF 2020 Between: l\,4r. 1\,4. Padma Rao, S/o. M. Kistaiah, Aged about 49 years, Occ. Advocate, Rio. Villa No. 43/A, Oorjitha Grand Vie-1, Beside Tridentapartment, Service Road, Gundlapochampally Village, Near Kompally, lr/edchal Malkajgiri District/ Ranga Reddy District. ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. The State of Telangana, through S. H. O. , Pet Basheerbad Police Station,medchal maikajgiri District, Cyberabad, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court, at Hyderabad. 2. Smt. Vidhi Baisiwala, W/o. Sanjay Kumar Baisiwala, Aged about 36 years, Occ. Household, R/o. Oorjitha Grand Vie-2, Villa No. 1 0, Gundlapochampally Village Road, Kompally, Cyberabad, Hyderabad. . ,. RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 482 of Cr. P.
C praying that in the circumstances stated in the l\,4emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Quash the proceeding in C. C. NO. 384 OF 2020, on the file of Hon'ble XXll IVletropolitan IMagistrate Cyberadbad at Medchal. l. A. NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 482 of Cr. P. C praying that in the circumstances stated in the ltrlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in C. C. NO. 384 OF 2O2O, on the file of HON'BLE XXll METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE CYBERADBAD AT MEDCHAL, including appearance of the petitioner. This Petition comrng on for hearing,upon perusing the [t/emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri SUDARSHAN REDDY DUDDUGUNTA ,Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No 1. The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI ]USTICE T. VINOD KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.
4259 of 2020 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the present criminal petition. It is also submitted that a letter dated 03. 12. 2020 to the above effect is filed into the Recistry. The said letter is taken on record of this Court. Acceding to the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the crirninal petitlon is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending nriscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed in the light of this final order. Sd/. K. SAILESHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// secrrofffrrcen To, 1. The XXll Metropolitan Magistrate , Cyberabad at l\,4edchal. 2' The Station House officer, pet Basheerbad porice station,Medchar Maikajgiri District, Cyberabad. 3. Two CCs to Public prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] 4. One CC to SRt. SUDARSHAN REDDY DUDDUGUNTA Advocate tOpUCl 5. Two CD Copies HIGH COURT TVKJ DATED:1511212020 ORDER CRLP. No. 4259 of 2020 o ? ". 1 il if. , tt "l o"/ F C.
*y ""-$ + DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS WITHDRAWN
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.