THRIVIKRAMA KAMMATH v. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (RESURVEY)
Court: High Court of Kerala
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Kerala judgment dated 2024-02-19. THRIVIKRAMA KAMMATH v. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (RESURVEY). Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. V. KUNHIKRISHNAN TH MONDAY, THE 19 DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 30TH MAGHA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 35813 OF 2016 PETITIONER: THRIVIKRAMA KAMMATH AGED 74 YEARS, S/O MADHAVA KAMMATH,RESIDING AT KOLLAPARAMBU HOUSE, CHUTTUPADUKARA, CHANGAMPUZHA ROAD, EDAPPALLY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN:682024. BY ADVS. SRI. SUNIL NAIR PALAKKAT SRI. K. N. ABHILASH SRI. M. A. AHAMMAD SAHEER SMT. K. AASHA RESPONDENTS: 1 THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (RESURVEY) COLLECTORATE, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM, PIN:682030. 2 THE RESURVEY SUPERINTENDENT OFFICE OF THE RESURVEY SUPERINTENDENT,MINI CIVIL STATION, ALUVA, PIN:683101. 3 SUSEELA PADMANABHA MALLAN AGED 65 YEARSM, W/O PADMANABHA MALLAN, RESIDING AT KOLLAPARAMBU HOUSE, CHUTTUPADUKARA,CHANGAMPUZHA ROAD, EDAPPALLY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN:682024. 4 PADMANABHA MALLAN AGED 74 YEARS, S/O P. J. NARAYANA MALLAN,RESIDING AT KOLLAPARAMBU HOUSE, CHUTTUPADUKARA,CHANGAMPUZHA ROAD, EDAPPALLY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT,PIN:682024.
OTHER PRESENT: SRI RIYAL DEVASSY, GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19. 02. 2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P. V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J. ----------------------------------- W. P. (C). No. 35813 of 2016 -----------------------------------th Dated this the 19 day of February, 2024 JUDGMENT The above writ petition is filed with following reliefs:- I. Issue a writ of mandamus or other order or direction to the respondents 1 & 2 to consider the application submitted in pursuance of Exhibit P2, and to take appropriate action. II. To pass any order or direction as this Honourable Court deems fit and proper while considering this writ petition. 2. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader. 3. This writ petition is pending before this Court from 2016 onwards. In such circumstance, this writ petition is need not be nd retained here.
There can be a direction to the 2 respondent to consider the application submitted by the petitioner as evident by Ext. P2, within a time frame. 4. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with the following directions. nd I. The 2 respondent is directed to consider the application submitted by the petitioner as evident by Ext. P2, after giving notice to the petitioner and to the respondent Nos. 3&4, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of 4 months, from the date of receipt of copy of this Judgment. II. The petitioner shall produce a certified copy of this Judgment along with a copy of the writ petition with nd exhibits, before the 2 respondent, for compliance. Sd/- P. V. KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE S. M. K. APPENDIX PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE PARTITION DEED NO. 3033 OF 1970 OF THE SRO EDAPPALLY. EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT RECEIPT AS ALC NO. 31/144/37 DATED 01. 08. 2016 ISSUED BY THE OFFICE OF THE IST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN I. A. NO. 7341/2016 IN OS NO. 1302/2016 OF THE IST ADDL. MUNSIFF’S COURT, ERNAKULAM.
Source: High Court of Kerala. Archive: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.