ECLIPTON TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: KULDEEP MATHUR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2026-08-10. ECLIPTON TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
[2026:RJ-JP:38259] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7306/2026 CNR: RJHC010815372026 | URN: CRLMP / 12622U / 2026 Eclipton Technologies Private Limited, R/o Hauzrani, Malviya Nagar, District South Delhi,delhi Presently At Near Boranada Policestation, Phase 2, District Jodhpur, Raj. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2. The Branch Manager, Suryoday Small finance Bank, Branch Hsr Layout,bangaluru, District Bangalorekarnataka 3. Dig, Cyber Crime, Police Headquarters,rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr Aashish Jakhar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Narendra Gehlot, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR Order 10/08/2026 1. The instant criminal misc. petition under Section 528 BNSS has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:- “ It is, therefore, most humbly and respectfully prayed that this Miscellaneous Petition may kindly be allowed, and by an appropriate order or direction: a.
That the respondents be directed to release the entire amount lying in Account No. 252000616419, IFSC Code SURY0BK0000. b. That the respondent bank be directed to pay damages and compensation for the mental agony and economic loss suffered by the petitioner. C. That the respondent bank be directed to retain only the disputed amount, if any, and permit the petitioner to operate the remaining balance in his account without any restrictions. d. That any other appropriate order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case be passed in favour of the petitioner. ” 2. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of this criminal misc. petition with a direction to the Suryoday Small Finance Bank [2026:RJ-JP:38259] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-7306/2026] (Respondent No.
2) to keep the disputed amount (the amount which was transferred illegally in the bank account of the petitioner) frozen and allow the petitioner to make transactions from his/its bank account from the remaining balance. 3. It is further made clear that in case, the respondent – Bank has not received the information regarding the exact figure of the disputed amount, which the Investigating Officer/Police alleges to be receipt(s) of the offence, the bank shall send a communication to the concerned Investigating Officer/Police, to indicate the amount to be earmarked for lien, while endorsing a copy of the instant order. 4. Upon receipt of such communication/letter, the concerned Investigating Officer/Police shall be under an obligation to apprise the respondent - Bank about the amount to be kept in lien, within a period of seven days of receiving the communication from the respondent - Bank. The respondent – bank shall thereafter do the needful as directed herein above. 5.
It is further made clear that in case, the respondent-Bank does not receive any reply from the concerned Investigating Officer/Police, then it shall be duty bound to act in accordance with the instant order. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the instant criminal misc. petition is disposed of. 7. Stay petition as well as all pending application, if any, stand disposed of. (KULDEEP MATHUR),J 280/Himanshu Singh
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.