Shaik Saleem v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: J SREENIVAS RAO
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2026-03-06. Shaik Saleem v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
I [ 3303 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3257 OF- 2026 Between: 'l Shaik Saleem S/o Shaik Tajduddin, Age: 41 years, Occ: Water Plant, Rl/o. Gangaram Thanda, lndlwai Mandal, Nizamabad. 2 Shaik Talduddin S/o Ameenuddin, Age: 70, Occ Business, R/o. Gangaram Thanda. lndlwai Mandal, Nizamabad 3. Abdul Naseer, S/o Khadeer, Age. 42, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. 3-58/1 Thirmanpally Village of lndlwai Mandal, Nizamabad. 4. Shaik [\ilunna, S/o Chand, Age. 37, Occ: Mechanic, R/o. Thirmanpally Village of lndlwar lvlandal, Nizamabad. I I I ... Petitioners/Accused No. 1 4 AND 1. The State of Telangana, rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. 2. Badavath Thukaram Nayak, S/o. Batlanayak, Age. 52 years, Occ: Agruculture, R/o. Vengalapad, lndlwai Mandal, Nizamabad. ...
RespondenUDefacto Complainant Petition under Section 528 of BNSS prayrng that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petitron, the High Court may be pleased to Quash the proceedings in SC. SPL. No. 10 of 2023, on the file of Special Sessions Judge for Trial of SC/ST (POA) Act Cases-Cum- llnd Additional Diskict Sessions Judge Court at Nizamabad. against the Petitioners/Accused No. 1 to 4 in the interest of justice l. A. NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim stay of all further proceedings including the appearance of the petitioners/accused No. 1 to 4 in SC SPL No 10 o'f 20? 3, on the file of Special Sessions Judge for Trial of SC/ST (POA) Act Cases-Cum- llnd Additional District Sessions Judge Court at Nizamabad in the interest of justice pending disposal of the criminal petition.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the M-'norandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Slr ma Ravi Kiran Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioners and Sri Jithender Rao Veeranrr lla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of lhe Respondent No. 1 and r one appeared for the Respondent No. 2. The Court made the following: ORDER -1qEltE4dm7 -F" . ,/ -- IN THE HIGH COUR T FOR I'HE STATE OF TE LANGANA AT HYDE RAB AD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO CRIMINA L PET ITI ON No . 3257 of 2026 Da te: 06. 0 3. 2026 Between Shaik Saleern and three othcrs . Petitioners AND The State of Telansana- Rep. by Public profecutor High Court for tt,. Stut" oi Te Iangana, at Hyderabad and another ... Respondents ORDER This Criminal pctition has been filed by rhe pelitioner/accused Nos. I to -1, seeking to quash the proceedings in S. C. SpL. No.
l0 ol 202j on the file of the Special Sessions Judge for Trial of SC/ST (pOA) Acr Cases_cum_ll Additional District Sessions Judge Courr at Nizamabad. 2. Heard Mr. Soma Ravi Kiran Reddy, leamed counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Jithendar Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No. l. t re criminal 3. With the consent of both the leamed counsel' stage of the admission petition is disposed at enterlairr tre criminal is not inclined to 4. When this Court rre levelled allegations that specific petition on the ground petitioners and the grounds raised in ie crimtnal against the juncture' at t by the trial Court' petition require adjudication 'is t r s Court to for the petitioners requested learned counsel I Nos' l to 4 of the petitioners/accus: dispense with the presence the fite of the Spr:' ial Sessions of 2023 on in S. C. SPL. No.
10 I Additional Judge lor Trial of SC/ST (POA) Act Cases-cum- Court at Nizamabad' District Sessions Judge not opposed Public Prosecutor hirr 5. The learned Additional thesubmissionmadebythelearnedcounselforpettoners. facts and the peculir consideration 6. Taking into petitic'r presence of er Nos 2 to 4 of the case, the circumstances (POA) iT Act lor Triat of S(r before the Special Sessions Judge lge Court at Additional District Sessions Jrr Cases-cum-ll with' unless ol 2023 is dispers:d S'C'SpL'No'10 Nizamabad' in co rrse of the trial' during the is speciticatty required their presence \ w subject to the condition that they shall be represented by their counsel on every date of hearing. In the event of non_appearance of petitioner Nos. 2 to 4/accused Nos. 2 to,l on anl,date so tixed by the trial Court, rhe trial Courl shall be entitted to proceed with the matter in accordance with law. However, no such reliel. is granted against petitioner No. I /accused No. I .
7 Accordingly, the criminal petition is disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applicarions, if any, shalI stand closed. SD/. P. C. SULEKHA DEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Special Sessions Judge for Trial of SC/S (P A) Act Cases-Cum-llnd Addrtional District Sessions Judge Court at Nizam 2 The Station House Officer, lndalwai Police Station, izamabad District 3 Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad lourl 4 One CC to Sri Soma Ravi Kiran Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 5 Two CD Copies GNK/PSL HIGH COURT DATED: 06/03/2026 ji'r , l, r € o t ORDER o z (J i,rjlil 20ffi o CRLP. No. 3257 ot 2026 -J * o DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITI)N 1,r,1 7b \t l,a
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.