Sri. Ramamohan Rao Mullapudi v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: T.VINOD KUMAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2024-01-02. Sri. Ramamohan Rao Mullapudi v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
[ 3166 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT . THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO: 35142 OF 2023 Between: Sri Ramamohan Rao Mullapudi, S/o. late Somabrahm, Aged about 80 years, Occ. Business R/o. 2-S, 607, Avenue Vendome, OAK Brook, lL- 60523, Presently Residing at H. No. 10-21126, Surya lcon, Peerzadiguda Main Road, Uppal, Hyderabad, Telangana-500039. ... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary (fVlunicipal Admn. ,) Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner, Peerzadiguda Municipal Corporation, IVledchal - IVaikajgiri District. 3 Sri. L. Karunakar, Rl/o. H. No. 8-43/8/5 12 East Balaji Hills Colony, Phase 3, Street No. 4, Boduppal-500092 Medchal-Malkajgiri District. ...
RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constrtution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Cou( may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of Respondent No. 2 an removing the illegal construction raised by un-official Respondent in Plot ad-measuring 332 sq. yards, situated at P and T Colony, under PMC Division No. 13, Medipally village, Ghatkesar Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District. , by occupying a portion of petitioner's land as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the officials respondents to immediately remove the illegal construction by acting upon pelitioner's representation dt 06l I Ol2O23. lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased (o direct the official Respondent No.
2 to immediately remove the illegal construction raised by un-official respondent in Plot ad-measuring 332 sq. yards situated at P & T Colony under PMC Division No. 1 3. Medipally village, Ghatkesar Mandal, Medchal-Malkajigiri District by acting upon petitioner's representation dt: 06110t2023. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI S. U. V. SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 : GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No. 2 : SRI B. JAGAN MADHAV RAO, SC FOR MUNICIPALITY Counsel for the Respondent No. 3 : The Court made the following: ORDER I THE HON'BLE SRI ]USTICE T. VINOD KUMAR W. P. No. 35142 of 2O23 ORDER: After making inltial submissions, learned counsel for the 1 petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ : Petition reserving liberty to the petitioner to avail remedies open . to him in law- 2. Sri B. Jagan Madhav Rao, learned Standing Counsel, appearing on behalf of respondent No.
2, has no objection for withdrawal of the Writ Petition by the petitioner. 3. Granting liberty as sought for, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. 4. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. KUMAR SD/. C. PRAVEE ASSISTANT RE ISTRAR //TRUE COPY' SECTION FFICER To, tfiEV3l'ish 1. co u rt ro r the s tate or ? *: 33 li"t E'""#X Rt|1"i3^A,t['? i3X* 2. MUNICIPALITY [OPUC] RAO, SC FOR I",SIET 3. JTTItIft hOOUJTOU 3 4 Two CD CoPies. BSK SB 9 HIGH COURT DATED:0210112024 srAra. arrE IY ? 2t2{ o s [ 5 ttB O di \ ORDER Dtsptic WP. No. 3S142 of 2023 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS . % -nr @c,\i" 6,ga-
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Archive: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.