T M CHANDRASHEKAR v. KAVYA B S
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2026-04-29. T M CHANDRASHEKAR v. KAVYA B S. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
- 1 - W. P. No. 24436/2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU TH DATED THIS THE 29 DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO. 24436/2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: T. M. CHANDRASHEKAR S/O LATE MALLEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/AT THAGADURU VILLAGE AND POST BILIGERE HOBLI NANJANGUD TALUK 571 301 MYSURU DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANIL KUMAR S, ADV. , [ABSENT]) AND: 1. KAVYA B. S. D/O LATE SHIVASWAMY AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS R/AT THAGADURU VILLAGE AND POST BILIGERE HOBLI NANJANGUD TALUK 571 301 MYSURU DISTRICT. 2. SMT. NAGARATHNA W/O LATE SHIVASWAMY AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS NO. 24 HEBBACHALLI VILLAGE-571313 CHAMARAJANAGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT. 3. SMT. NETHRAVATHI W/O NANJUNDEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS NO. 24 HEBBACHALLI VILLAGE-571313 CHAMARAJANAGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT. - 2 - W. P. No. 24436/2022 4. SRI. LOKESH S S/O LATE SHIVASWAMY SINCE DEAD BY LRS. 4(a) SMT. MAHALAKSHMI W/O LATE LOKESH AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS.
4(b) KUSHAL GOWDA L S/O LATE LOKESH AGED ABOUT 5 YEARS. 4(c) NAKUL GOWDA L S/O LATE LOKESH AGED ABOUT 3 YEARS RESPONDENTS 4(b) AND 4(c) ARE MINORS, REP. BY GUARDIAN RESPONDENT. ALL ARE R/AT THAGADOORU VILLAGE-571301 BELIGERE HOBLI, NANJANGUDU TALUK MYSURU DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. VANAJAKSHI, ADV. , FOR R1 TO R3 R4(a) TO R4(c) ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS. QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD IN O. S. NO. 96/2017 ON IA UNDER ORDER XVI RULES 1 AND 2 R/W SEC 151 OF CPC DTD 19. 10. 2022 UNDER ANNEXURE-G BY ALLOWING THIS WRIT PETITION WHICH IS NECESSARY. ALLOW THE APPLICATION UNDER ORDER XVI RULES 1 AND 2 R/W SEC. 151 OF CPC DATED 19. 10. 2022 UNDER ANNEXURE-G AND PERMIT THE PETITIONER TO EXAMINE WITNESSES 13-15 BY ISSUING SUMMONS FROM THE COURT WHICH IS NECESSARY IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY & ETC. - 3 - W. P. No.
24436/2022 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 2. The order dated 18. 12. 2025 also indicates that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on the said date and the interim order was not continued. 3. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismiss for non-prosecution. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE BSR List No. : 1 Sl No. : 39
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.