BUDHA RAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: DINESH MEHTA,RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2024-04-01. BUDHA RAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[2024:RJ-JD:14500-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D. B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 107/2024 Budha Ram S/o Shri Ramlal @ Ramu Ram, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Bhojas Nagar, District Nagaur (Raj. ). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Superintendent Of Police, Nagaur (Raj. ). 3. The Station House Officer, Police Station Pachori, District Nagaur (Raj. ). 4. Lakhu Ram S/o Shri Babu Lal, Resident Of Sutharon Ki Dhaniya, Jhadelki Tantwas, Nagaur (Raj. ). 5. Shri Babu Lal S/o Shri Bhola Ram, Resident Of Sutharon Ki Dhaniya, Jhadelki Tantwas, Nagaur (Raj. ). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Om Prakash Mr. Mhd. Sajid For Respondent(s) : Mr. Anil Joshi, GA-cum-AAG assisted by Mr. Rajat Chhaparwal Mr. Kheta Ram, SI, SHO Panchodi, District Nagaur Ms. Shanti Makaki (1047) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA HON'BLE MR.
JUSTICE RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI Order “In Camera” 01/04/2024 1. By way of present habeas corpus petition, the petitioner has alleged that he has contracted marriage with the girl ‘P’ and her parents have illegally detained her against her wishes, despite the fact that she wants to live with him. [2024:RJ-JD:14500-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-107/2024] 2. The corpus has been brought before this Court along with her grand father and mother by the police, as per the instructions given by Mr. Joshi, learned Government Advocate cum Additional Advocate General. 3. We have interacted with the corpus ‘in camera’ and during such interaction she asserted that the petitioner had misled her and took her signature on certain blank papers. 4. The corpus also asserted that she being a major, wants to live with her parents and not with the petitioner. 5. In view of the statement so given by the corpus, nothing remains to be done and the present habeas corpus petition is dismissed with a cost of Rs.
20,000/-to be paid by the petitioner. The cost shall be deposited by the petitioner before the Rajasthan State Legal Services Authority, Jodhpur within a period of seven days from today. 6. A copy of this order be sent to the Secretary, Rajasthan State Legal Services Authority, Jodhpur. (RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI),J (DINESH MEHTA),J 53-raksha/-
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Archive: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.