KHADIM HUSSAIN AND ORS. v. VIVEK BHARDWAJ,SECY.MED.EDUCATION AND ANR.
Court: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
Bench: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jammu and Kashmir judgment dated 2024-11-20. KHADIM HUSSAIN AND ORS. v. VIVEK BHARDWAJ,SECY.MED.EDUCATION AND ANR. Read the judgment and case...
Judgment text
Serial No. 45 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case:- CPSW No. 380/2015 in SWP No. 98/2013 c/w CPSW No. 122/2015 CM No. 6285/2024 Wazir Hussain and others ….. Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. M. Y. Akhoon, Advocate. Vs Shantmanu, Secy. Medical Education and . …. Respondent(s) another Through: Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG. Coram: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE ORDER (20. 11. 2024) 1. The instant contempt petitions have been filed for alleged non-compliance of order/judgment dated 20. 11. 2014 passed by this Court in the writ petition bearing SWP No. 98/2013 in the case titled “Kher Singh & others Vs. State of J&K & Others”. The operative part of the order/judgment is extracted hereunder: “5.
The relief as restricted to the aforesaid situation is totally innocuous, therefore, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents that they shall accord consideration to the cases of petitioners in accordance with the applicable provisions as referred to hereinabove or in accordance with any other enabling provisions and to take a final decision within a period of two months from the date, a copy of this order is served on the respondents. The decision as shall be taken thereon be conveyed to the petitioners. 2 CPSW No. 380/2015 c/w CPSW No. 122/2015 6. Furthermore, the respondents shall also accord consideration to the release of duly earned wages in favour of the petitioners in the light of the communication of the Director Health Services, Jammu dated 24. 12. 2023 addressed to Secretary to Govt. Health and Medical Education Department. ” 2. Compliance report stands filed by the respondents, it is stated that the Administrative Department vide letter No.
HD-Legal/276/2022-02(c. No. 224632) dated 12. 07. 2022 conveyed the decision of the Finance Department taken in the meeting with the advice to reject the claim of the petitioners for regularization of their services. The respondents have passed a speaking order thereby rejecting the claim of the petitioners, being devoid of merit. 3. The contempt proceedings in both the contempt petitions initiated against the respondents are closed. However, the petitioners are at liberty to challenge the consideration order, if they desire so. (MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI) JUDGE JAMMU 20. 11. 2024 Shivalee Whether the order is speaking: Yes/ No Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No Shivalee Khajuria 2024. 11. 26 13:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.