SHRI LENRUMEW (ACCUSED) AND 2 ORS v. THE STATE OF NAGALAND
Court: Gauhati High Court
Bench: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA
Judgment date:
Case summary
Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2024-08-12. SHRI LENRUMEW (ACCUSED) AND 2 ORS v. THE STATE OF NAGALAND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Page No. # 1/3 GAHC020004392024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : I. A. (Crl. )/22/2024 SHRI LENRUMEW (ACCUSED) AND 2 ORS S/O KIUTSANGKIU R/O NEW VONGDI VILLAGE PO/PS- PUNGRO DIST- KIPHIRE, NAGALAND 2: SHRI MUGHAHO AYE (VICTIM) S/O VIHOI R/O H. NO. 73-A HARALU COLONY BURMA CAMP DIST- DIMAPUR NAGALAND 3: SHRI SOLOMON (VICTIM) S/O SIDDAK ALI SHEIKH R/O H. NO. 72 MIDDLE POINT COLONY OPPOSITE PENTALOON SHOPPING COMPLEX DIST- DIMAPUR NAGALAN VERSUS THE STATE OF NAGALAND KOHIMA NAGALAND Advocate for the Petitioner : P SURIEN Advocate for the Respondent : P. P, NAGALAND Page No. # 2/3 BEFORE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA ORDER Date : 12. 08. 2024 Heard Mr. Pfosekho Pfotte, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. S. Mere, learned Public Prosecutor for the State respondent No. 1. This is an application for amendment of the criminal petition No.
16/2024 which was jointly filed by the accused as well as by the victim for quashing the FIR as well as the charge-sheet filed against the accused No. 1. It is submitted that in the cause title of the criminal petition No. 16/2024, the charge-sheet No. 42/2023 dated 30. 10. 2023 was not incorporated inadvertently and at the same time in the prayer portion also the prayer for quashing of the charge-sheet was also not there and accordingly, as per the order dated 25. 06. 2024, the present I. A has been filed for correction/amendment of the prayer portion as well as the cause title of the criminal petition No. 16/2024. The portions which are to be amended have already been incorporated separately in paragraph No. 4 as I & II of the present application. Page No. # 3/3 Ms. Mere, learned Public Prosecutor raised no objection in that regard. Accordingly, considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and also considering the other aspects of the case.
The present interlocutory application is allowed and the petitioner is allowed to file a corrected/amended petition, a copy may be served accordingly to the State respondent. In view of above, this interlocutory application stands allowed and disposed of. Sd/- JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: Gauhati High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.