GHANSHYAM SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS
Court: High Court of Himachal Pradesh
Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Himachal Pradesh judgment dated 2020-10-12. GHANSHYAM SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP Nos. 1374, 1131, 1132, 1134, 1135, 1143, 1147, 1231, 1593, 1607, 1608, 2880, 2884, 2911, 2918, 2927, 2935, 2953, 2973, 2975, 2976, 3111, 3112, 3113, 3116 to 3119, 3205, 3206, 3208, 3210, 3268, 3272 & 3273 of 2020, 3886 & 4221 of 2019. Date of Decision: October 12, 2020 1. CWP No. 1374 of 2020. Netar Kumar Sharma & Others ... Petitioners Versus State of H. P. & Others ... Respondents 2. CWP No. 1131 of 2020. Pradeep Kumar & Others ... Petitioners Versus State of H. P. & Others ... Respondents 3. CWP No. 1132 of 2020. Jagdish Kumar & Others ... Petitioners Versus State of H. P. & Others ... Respondents 4. CWP No. 1134 of 2020. Rahul Sharma & Others ... Petitioners Versus State of H. P. & Others ... Respondents 5. CWP No. 1135 of 2020. Mohan Singh & Others ... Petitioners Versus State of H. P. & Others ... Respondents 6. CWP No. 1143 of 2020. Prem Singh & Others ... Petitioners Versus State of H. P. & Others ... Respondents 7. CWP No.
1147 of 2020. Roshan Lal Verma & Others ... Petitioners Versus State of H. P. & Others ... Respondents 8. CWP No. 1231 of 2020. Joga Singh & Others ... Petitioners Versus State of H. P. & Others ... Respondents 9. CWP No. 1593 of 2020. Surinder Kumar & Others ... Petitioners Versus State of H. P. & Others ... Respondents 10. CWP No. 1607 of 2020. Karam Singh & Others ... Petitioners Versus State of H. P. & Others ... Respondents 11. CWP No. 1608 of 2020. Sandeep Jaswal & Others ... Petitioners Versus State of H. P. & Others ... Respondents 12. CWP No. 2880 of 2020. Mohan Lal & Others ... Petitioners Versus State of H. P. & Others ... Respondents 13. CWP No. 2884 of 2020. Yadvinder Kumar & Others ... Petitioners Versus State of H. P. & Others ... Respondents 14. CWP No. 2911 of 2020. Kanta Kumari & Others ... Petitioners Versus State of H. P. & Others ... Respondents 15. CWP No. 2918 of 2020. Arun Kumar & Others ... Petitioners Versus State of H. P. & Others ... Respondents 16. CWP No.
2927 of 2020. Manoo Mahesh Sharma & Others ... Petitioners Versus State of H. P. & Others ... Respondents 17. CWP No. 2935 of 2020. Ishwar Chand & Others ... Petitioners Versus State of H. P. & Others ... Respondents 18. CWP No. 2953 of 2020. Rajesh Raghuvanshi & Others ... Petitioners Versus State of H. P. & Others ... Respondents 19. CWP No. 2973 of 2020. Avinesh Kumar & Others ... Petitioners Versus State of H. P. & Others ... Respondents 20. CWP No. 2975 of 2020. Parminder Singh Rana & Others ... Petitioners Versus State of H. P. & Others ... Respondents 21. CWP No. 2976 of 2020. Narender Singh & Others ... Petitioners Versus State of H. P. & Others ... Respondents 22. CWP No. 3111 of 2020. Sanjay Kumar & Others ... Petitioners Versus State of H. P. & Others ... Respondents 23. CWP No. 3112 of 2020. Pradeep Kumar Thakur & Others ... Petitioners Versus State of H. P. & Others ... Respondents 24. CWP No. 3113 of 2020. Chander Prakash & Others ... Petitioners Versus State of H. P.
& Others ... Respondents 25. CWP No. 3116 of 2020. Desh Raj & Others ... Petitioners Versus State of H. P. & Others ... Respondents 26. CWP No. 3117 of 2020. Ghanshyam Singh & Others ... Petitioners Versus State of H. P. & Others ... Respondents 27. CWP No. 3118 of 2020. Kamla Devi & Others ... Petitioners Versus State of H. P. & Others ... Respondents 28. CWP No. 3119 of 2020. Sharman Dass Bhagta & Others ... Petitioners Versus State of H. P. & Others ... Respondents 29. CWP No. 3205 of 2020. Gian Dass & Others ... Petitioners Versus State of H. P. & Others ... Respondents 30. CWP No. 3206 of 2020. Meera Mandhotra ... Petitioner Versus State of H. P. & Others ... Respondents 31. CWP No. 3208 of 2020. Ranjeet Singh & Others ... Petitioners Versus State of H. P. & Others ... Respondents 32. CWP No. 3210 of 2020. Vijay Pal & Others ... Petitioners Versus State of H. P. & Others ... Respondents 33. CWP No. 3268 of 2020. Jitender Singh & Others ... Petitioners Versus State of H. P.
& Others ... Respondents 34. CWP No. 3272 of 2020. Pritam Kumar Sharma & Others ... Petitioners Versus State of H. P. & Others ... Respondents 35. CWP No. 3273 of 2020. Vineet Vasudev & Others ... Petitioners Versus State of H. P. & Others ... Respondents 36. CWP No. 3886 of 2019. Sanjay Kumar ... Petitioner Versus State of H. P. & Others ... Respondents 37. CWP No. 4221 of 2019. Suresh Kumar & Others ... Petitioners Versus State of H. P. & Others ... Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice L. Narayana Swamy, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara, Judge. 1 Whether approved for reporting? No. For the petitioners : Mr. Adarsh K. Vashisht & Mr. Shivam Prashar, Advocates. For the respondents : Mr. Ashok Sharma, A. G. with Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Ms. Ritta Goswami & Mr. Nand Lal Thakur, Addl. AGs. COURT PROCEEDINGS CONVENED THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE L.
Narayana Swamy, Chief Justice(oral) By way of the instant writ petitions, the petitioners are seeking a direction to the respondents to grant and allow the 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? increments at the admissible rate on the running pay scale to them w. e. f. 2000-2007 by adding the same to their basic pay at the time of their regularization, with all consequential benefits. 2. Having gone through the averments made in the writ petitions as also the documents annexed therewith, it appears that the petitioners have straight away approached this Court and have not made any demand/representation to the respondents for redressal of their grievances.
Without providing an opportunity to the respondents to examine the case of the petitioner in respect of the prayer made, no cause of action can be said to have been accrued in favour of the petitioner, in case he/she approaches this Court directly, without filing any representation before the respondents. In case, the representation filed by the petitioner is rejected, then the petitioner would get the cause of action to approach this Court. 3. In view of the above, the writ petitions are disposed of permitting the petitioners to approach the respondents, at the first instance, for redressal of their grievances. On receipt of such representation, the respondents are directed to consider and pass appropriate order on the representation within a period of three months thereafter, in accordance with law. 4.
It goes without saying that the petitioners will be at liberty to approach this Court for redressal of their grievances, in case the decision on the representation goes against them, if they are so advised. 5. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. (L. Narayana Swamy), Chief Justice. (Anoop Chitkara), October 12, 2020(ps) Judge.
Source: High Court of Himachal Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.