Goftimukkaia Prabhakar and 5 Others v. N.Ravi Kiran
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: P NAVEEN RAO
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-12-11. Goftimukkaia Prabhakar and 5 Others v. N.Ravi Kiran. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF DECEIMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P NAVEEN RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1315 OF 2019 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to Punish the Respondents herein for violating disobeying the Orders of the High Court dated 0810712019 in WP No. 4172112018. Between: 1. Gottimukkala Prabhakar, S/o. Narsaiah, Aged 42 Years, Occ. Govt. Employee, R/o Ghanpuram (ltlulug) Village and Mandal, Warangal District. 2. Rayabaram Satyapathi, S/o. Laxapathi, Aged 53 Years, Occ. Govt. Employee, R/o H. No. 2-B-3, Waddepally Village, Hanamkonda [t/andal, Warangal District. 3. Methuku Venkateshwarlu, S/o. Sambaiah, Aged 67 Years, Occ. Retd. Govt. Employee, Rl/o Raghunathpaly Village, Jaffargadh Mandal, Warangal District. 4. Vanamala Yadagiri, S/o. Bhadraiah, Aged 59 Years, Occ. Retd. Govt. Employee, Rl/o Krishnajigudem Village, Station Ghanpur Mandal, Warangal District. 5.
Sumanda Shiromani, W/o. S. Surender, Aged 36 Years, Occ. House Wife, R|/o H. No. 2-7-372, Excise Colony, Subedari, Hanamkonda, Warangal. 6. S. Mounica, D/o. Bhaskar, Aged 38 Years, Occ. Doctor, F/o H. No. 2-7-372, Excise Colony, Subedari, Hanamkonda, Warangal. .. PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS ANO 1. N. Ravi Kiran, S/o. Krishnan, Occ. Commissioner of Greater Municipal Corporation of Warangal and Vice Chairman of Kakatiya Urban DevelopmentAuthority, Camp Office. Near Childrens Park, Balasamudram, Hanamkonda -506 00'1 , Warangal Urban District. 2. P amela Sathpathi,, Vice Chairman, Kakatiya Urban Development Authority, Hanmakonda, Warangal Urban Dist. (R2 impleaded as per the Honble Court Order d1. 06. 03. 2020 in CC No. 1 3'1 5 of 201 9). .. ,RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT NO.
3 lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Authorities herein to delete the Petitioners land from the Layout vide D. P. No. 8/1 986 as per the Order of this Honourable High Court dated 0810712019 passed in W. P. No. 4'1 72112018, pending disposal of the Contempt Petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI K. GOVERDHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent 1: SRI M. AJAY KUMAR (S. C. FOR TG K. U. D. A) Counsel for the Respondent 2: None appeared The Court made the following: ORDER 1_ HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO CONTEMPT CASE No. 1315 of 2O19 ORDER Writ Petition No. 4l72l of 2018 was disposed of by order dated 08. 07. 20i9 granting three weeks time to the KUDA to take immediate steps to issue appropriate proceedings in compliance of the judgment rendered by this Court in Second Appeal No. 755 of 2013 and Batch, dated 27 . 10. 2014.
Alleging delay in compliance of the said direction, this contempt case is filed. 02. On 13. 10. 2020, leamed Senior Counsel appearing for KUDA represented that Interlocutory Application No. 1 ol 2O2O was fi1ed seeking extension of time of four weeks for compliance and if three weeks time is granted, compliance would be reported. Recording the same, matter was adjourned to 12. 11. 2O2O. Thereafter, the matter underwent four adjournments on the request of counsel for respondents on the ground of ill-health. Today, when the matter is taken-up, Iearned counsel for petitioners as well as learned counsel for respondents informs the Court that appropriate orders were passed on 05. 12 . 2O2O resolving the problem of the petitioners. However, learned counsei for petitioners sought to contend that in compliance of the undertaking given to this Court on 13. 10. 2020, orders ought to have been passed on or before 12. 11.
2020 and there is delay in passing orders and this delay is not explained satisfactorily. 03. No doubt, there is merit in what is contended by learned counsel for petitioners. However, having regard to the fact that orders are now complied, by expressing displeasure in the manner in which matter was handled by KUDA and warning to be careful -3- -) not to repeat such mistakes in future, this Contempt Case is closed. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- C. V. MALLIKARJUNA VARMA DEPUTY REGI R ,TRUE COPY' SECTION OFFICER To, 1. Sri N. Ravi Kiran, S/o. Krishnan, Occ. Commissioner of Greater Municipal Corporation of Warangal and Vice Chairman of Kakatiya Urban DevelopmentAuthority, Camp Office. Near Childrens Park, Balasamudram, Hanamkonda -506 001, Warangal Urban District. 2. Sri Pamela Sathpathi, Vice Chairman, Kakatiya Urban Development Authority, Hanmakonda, Warangal Urban District. 3. One CC to SRI K. GOVERDHAN REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to SRI M.
AJAY KUMAR, (S. C. FOR TS K. U. D. A) [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies {; HIGH COURT DATED:1 111212020 I ri E i;i o. , o t. ) 1 I 0Ec zrMA \ * r, ORDER CC. No. 1315 of 2019 CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE. S\V ( b COP A \)-lF$ \ \'. na
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.