DHIRENDRA KUMAR v. STATE
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: SANDEEP MEHTA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2020-12-15. DHIRENDRA KUMAR v. STATE. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Criminal Misc(Pet. ) No. 6147/2019 1. Dhirendra Kumar S/o Parasmal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Rajeev Gandhi Colony, Pal Link Road, Jodhpur. 2. Ramesh S/o Bhuraram Patel, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Mool Ki Dhani, Tehsil Pachpadra, District Barmer. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan 2. Hanuman Ram S/o Foolram, R/o Pilwa, Lohawat, District Jodhpur. At Present Residing At Care Of Bhuraram Meghwal, Lala Lajpat Ray Colony, 5th Road, Pratap Nagar, Jodhpur City (West), District Jodhpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Muktesh Maheshwari through VC. For Respondent(s) : Mr. A. R. Choudhary, PP. Mr. Mahesh Khiyani through VC. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA Order 15/12/2020 Learned Public Prosecutor has placed on record a factual report as per which, the I. O. has not found the petitioner No. 1 Dhirendra Kumar involved in the offences.
However, the offences under Sections 341 & 323 IPC and Sections 3(1)(r)(s) & 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act have been found proved against the petitioner No. 2 Ramesh. In view of the above development, Shri Maheshwari, learned counsel representing the petitioners, craves that he may be allowed to withdraw the misc. petition leaving the petitioner No. 2 (2 of 2) [CRLMP-6147/2019] Ramesh at liberty to raise all his objections before the competent forum at the appropriate stage. Accordingly, the misc. petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty prayed for. Stay application is also rejected. (SANDEEP MEHTA),J 15-Tikam/-
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.