SHAIK PASHA v. PRL. SECY., FOREST DEPT. AND 3 ORS.
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-01-20. SHAIK PASHA v. PRL. SECY., FOREST DEPT. AND 3 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
32551 [ HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N. V. SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO: 18250 OF 2017 Between: Shaik Pasha, S/o Ahmed, Aged about 40 years, Occ: Business, RJo Neradigonda Village and Mandal, Adilabad District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Telangana, rep by its Principal Secretary, Forest Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The District Collector, Adllabad, Adilabad District. 3. The Divisional Forest Officer, Adilabad Division, Adilabad. 4. The Forest Range Offrcer, Neradigonda Range, Neradigonda, Adilabad District. .....
RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in interfering /dispossessing from the petitioners land in Sy. No. 2, lo an extent of 24 X 58 Feet situated at Neradigonda Village and Mandal, Adilabad District as illegal, arbitrary, violation of the principles of natural justice and as well as the fundamental rights guaranteed under the constitution of lndia and consequently { direct the respondents not to interfere i disposes the petitioners from the above said land. I. A. NO:1 OF 2017(WVMP. NO: 2786 0F 20171 Between 1. The State of. Telangana, rep by its Principal Secretary, Forest Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Divisional Forest Officer, Adilabad Division, Adilabad.
3 Forest Range Officer, Neradigonda Range, Neradigonda, Ile Adilabad District. PETITIONRS/RESPONDENTS AND '1. Shaik Pasha, S/o Ahmed, Aged about 40 years, Occ: Business, R/o Neradigonda Village and Mandal, Adilabad Distriit. ..... RESPONDENTS'PETITIONER 2. The District Collector, Adilabad, Adilabad District. (Respondent / Respondent No. 2 is not necessary party in this petition) .... RESPONDENTS'RESPONDENTS Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders passed on dt. 07. 06. 2017 in w. p. No. 192so of zoll and dismiss the writ petition with costs. I. A. NO:2 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 2 2267 OF 20171 Petition Under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere / dispossess the petitioner from land in Sy. No.
2, to an extent of 24 X 58 Feet situated at Neradigonda Village and Mandal, Adilabad District, pending disposal of the rnain writ petition. i. A. NO: 3 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 25098 OF 2017) Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the Hrgh Court may be pleased to extend the order passed in WP No 18250 of 2017 Dt: 0746-2017 until further orders. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI A. JAGAN Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1, 3 & 4 : GP FOR FORESTS Counsel for the Respondent No. 2 : GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following ORDER HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N. V. SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No. 18250 of 20'17 ORDER: On 06. 01 . 2025, when the matter was taken up for hearing, none appeared for petitioner, hence, the matter was . speciatty directed to be tisted to today, under the caption identified cases'.
ln spite of the matter being posted under the caption "Speciatty ldentified Cases", there is no representation on behatf of the petitioner either in physicat mode or in virtual mode. Hence, there is no other option to this Court except to dismiss the Writ Petition for non-prosecution. 2. Accordingty, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shatt be no order as to costs. 3. As sequel to it, Miscettaneous Petitions, if any pending, shatt stand disntissed. Sd/- N. RAJ ASSISTANT RE STRAR //TRUE COPYII / SECTION FFICER To l. Two CCs to GP for FORESTS, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OLIT] 2. Two CCs to GP for REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] 3. One CC to SRI A. JAGAN, Advocate IOPUC] 4. Two CD Copies SA MP lP HIGH COURT DATED:20101,t2025 - t,. t. ,. / /. , , (, /i! il. -r . lt2i irI 0 3 }itis \-"^ i? (-O _Dr:spa-r rjs ORDER WP. No. 18250 of 2017 DISMISSING'THE W. P _ FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS.
(a- ts l> lzs gcl\D
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.