Mohammed Nadeemuddin v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: JUVVADI SRIDEVI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-02-11. Mohammed Nadeemuddin v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
13257 | (sHow CAUSE NOTTCE BEFORE ADMtSStON) IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY . TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1877 OF 2025 Between: 1. Mohammed Nadeemuddin, S/o Mohammed Naseeruddin 2. lvlohammed Nayeemuddin, S/o. tvlohammed Naseeruddin Petitioners/Accused No. 3 and 5 AND 1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana At Hyderabad. 2. Syed Sajid Ali, S/o late Syed Wazir Ali, Rio. H. No. 1 -5-167, lndiranagar, Tandur, Vikarabad District. Respondents/Defacto Complai nant WHEREAS the Petitioners above named through their Advocate Sri KHAJA VIZARATH ALI presented this Petition under Section 528 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings against the petitioner/Accused No. 3 and 5 in F. l. R.
No. 90 of 2025 on the file of P. S. Malkajgiri, Rachakondaand; AND WHEREAS the High Court upon perusing the petition and memorandum of grounds filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri KHAJA VIZARATH ALl, Advocate for the Petitioners and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Addl. Public Prosecutor for the Respondent No. 1, directed issue of notice to the Respondent No. 2, herein to show cause as to why this CRIIUINAL PETITION should not be admitted. You viz: Syed Sajid Ali, S/o. late Syed Wazir Ali, R/o H. No. 1-5-167,lndiranagar, Tandur, Vikarabad District. are directed to show cause on or before 22. 04. 2025 to which date the case stands posted as to why in the circumstances set out in the petition and the memorandum of grounds filed therewith (copy enclosed) this CRltt/INAL PETITION should not be admitted.
lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including arrest of the petitioner/A<;cused No. 3 and 5 F. l. R. No. 90 of 2025 on the file of P. S. tt/alkajgiri, Rachakonda pending disposal of CRLP No. 1877 of 2025, on the file of the High Court. The Court made the following: ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners" lssue notice to respondent No. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners is also permitted to take out personal notice to respondent No. 2 by registered post with acknowledgment due and file proof of service in the Registry by the next date of hearing. Heard Sri Khaja Vizarat Ali, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners-accused Nos. 3 and 5 and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the record.
Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner:s submits that the petitioners/accused Nos. 3 and 5 are no way concerned with the alleged offence. A private complaint is lodged by the de fac:to complainant, as there are civil suits pending between the respon,dent No. 2 and the accused No. 1. Accused No. 1 and petitioners hereinr are family friends and accused No. 1 and petitioner No. 2 herein are doing real estate business, petitioner No. I is an advocate and he is legal advisor of accused No. 1 and there is no role of the petitioner:; herein in the said crime. lt is further submitted that respondent No. 2 created documents and filed false suits against accused No. 1 and the pertitioners herein and trying to grab the land of accused No. 1, being a legal advisor of accused No. l the accused No. 3 interfered and given the legal opinion to accused No. 1 and keeping grudge in mind impleaded in ther above false crime. Hence, he seeks to stay all further proceedings against the petitioner.
ln the said circumstances, the lnvestigating O'l'ficer in FIR No. 90 of 2025 on the file of Malkajgiri Police Station, Flachakonda against petitioners/accused Nos. 3 and 5 is directed to proceed with the investigation. However, the petitioners/accused Nos. 3 and 5 shall not be arrested, pending Criminal Petition. List on 22. 04. 2025. A . - SD/. L. LAKSIINII BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR /TRUE COPYII S OFFICER To, 1. The Prl. Junior Civil JuniolCirit Judge-Cum-Metropolitan Magistrate, Medchal-Malkajgiri. , 2. The Station Hopse Offiier, Police Station lt/alkajgiri, Rachakonda. 3. Syed Sajid Ali, S/o. late Syed WazirAli, Occ. Business, R/o H. No. 1-5-167, lndiranagar, Tandur, Vikarabad District. (by RPAD- along with a copy of petition and merporandum of grounds) 4. One CC to SRI KHAJA VIZARATH ALl, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court at Hyderabad [OUT] 6. One spare copy / HIGH COURT JS,J DATED i11 . 02. 2025 LrsT oN 22. 04. 2025 1 rO. 1q;[.
, 1l ( ::-; \ L) {r ,a , NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION ;:;:-t. ,1 (- , . r'lrr' . ,,7 {( D L.. T \ ---' CRLP. No. 1877 of 2025 DIRECTION
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.