TD AHAR CHIRU v. STATE OF MANIPUR AND ANR
Court: High Court of Manipur
Bench: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Manipur judgment dated 2020-06-25. TD AHAR CHIRU v. STATE OF MANIPUR AND ANR. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Item No. 10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL W. P. (C) No. 312 of 2020 T. D Ahar Chiru ……. Petitioner/s -Versus- State of Manipur and Anr. ...... Respondent/s B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MR. AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH O R D E R 25. 06. 2020 Heard Mr. M. Hemchandra, learned senior counsel assisted by Juno Rahman appearing for the petitioner and also heard Mr. K. Jagat, learned Government Advocate appearing respondents. Mr. M. Hemchandra, learned senior counsel submitted before this Court that the impugned transfer order has been issued in violation of the transfer policy of the State Government as well as various office memorandum for regulating transfer issued by the Government of Manipur. Accordingly, the petitioner had submitted a representation dated 23. 06. 2020 to the respondents No. 1 and 2 requesting for revoking the impugned transfer order.
The learned senior counsel submitted that the writ petition can be disposed of by directing the respondents to consider and dispose of the said representation by passing a speaking order. The learned counsel further submitted that pending consideration and disposal of the said representation, the petitioner be allowed to stay in her present place of posting. W. P(C) No. 312 of 2020 Page 1 It is also submitted by learned senior counsel that the petitioner has not been released pursuant to the impugned transfer order and at present, she is still discharging her duties at her present place of posting, i. e. , Rural Family Welfare Centre, Nambol. Mr. K. Jagat, learned Government Advocate fairly submits that the respondents can be directed to consider and disposed of the aforesaid representation by passing a speaking order. After hearing both the counsels, the present writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to consider and dispose of the aforesaid representation dated 23.
06. 2020 submitted by the petitioner by issuing a speaking order within a period of 4(four) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is made clear that pending disposal of the said representation, the writ petitioner should be allowed to continue at her present place of posting. With the above direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. A copy of this order may be issued to counsel through their respective e-mail. JUDGE A. Surjit Digitally signed WAIKHO by WAIKHOM TONEN MEITEI M TONEN Date: 2020. 06. 25 MEITEI 15:13:14 +05'30' W. P(C) No. 312 of 2020 Page 2
Source: High Court of Manipur. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.