TORIN K. MARAK AND 57 ORS. v. AMBROSE CH. MARAK
Court: High Court of Meghalaya
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT MORE (FORMER JUDGE)
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Meghalaya judgment dated 2020-06-26. TORIN K. MARAK AND 57 ORS. v. AMBROSE CH. MARAK. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Serial No. 01-05 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Cont. Cas(C). No. 13 of 2020 with Cont. Cas(C). No. 14 of 2020 Cont. Cas(C). No. 15 of 2020 Cont. Cas(C). No. 16 of 2020 Cont. Cas(C). No. 17 of 2020 Date of Order: 26. 06. 2020 Shri. Tengrak M. Sangma & Ors. Vs. Shri. Ambrose Ch. Marak. Shri. Torin K. Marak & Ors. Vs. Shri. Ambrose Ch. Marak. Shri. Asilbirth R. Marak & Ors. Vs. Shri. Ambrose Ch. Marak. Shri. Probirth D. Marak & Ors. Vs. Shri. Ambrose Ch. Marak. Shri. Loppuston S. Sangma & Ors. Vs. Shri. Ambrose Ch. Marak. Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjit Vasantrao More, Judge. Appearance: For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr. P. T. Sangma, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. A. Kumar, AG with Mr. A. Kharwanlang, GA. th Learned Advocate General on instruction made a statement that on 25 June, 2020, the terms of the petitioners have been further extended for 59 days or till fresh recruitment is done, whichever is earlier.
In the light of the statement made by learned Advocate General, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly concedes that the contempt petitions would not survive for consideration. He accordingly, seeks leave to withdraw the contempt petitions. Leave granted. Contempt petitions disposed of as withdrawn. Liberty to petitioners incase the earlier statement of learned Advocate General which was the subject matter of the petitions or the statement made in the present order by learned Advocate General is not honoured or complied with. Judge Meghalaya 26. 06. 2020 “Samantha PS”
Source: High Court of Meghalaya. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.