K.Mahaboob Khan v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Bench: RAVI NATH TILHARI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Andhra Pradesh judgment dated 2024-10-16. K.Mahaboob Khan v. The State of Andhra Pradesh. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI WRIT PETITION NO: 47108 OF 201B Between; 1. K. Mahaboob Khan, S/o K. Abdul Hammidkhan Mohammadan, aged about 55 years R/o Amarapuram village And Mandal, Anantapur District presently residing at Y. N. Housekota Pavagada taluk, Karnataka State. 2. K. Shaikshavali, S/o Mohammed Hameed sab, aged about 54 years, R/o Amarapuram village and Mandal, Anantapur Dist. 3. K. Munavar Khan, S/o K. Ayub Khan aged about 52 years R/o Amarapuram village and Mandal, Anatapur District. ... PETITIONERS AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur Dist. 2. The District Collector, Anantapur District. 3. The Joint Collector, Anantapur dist. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Penukonda, Anantapur Dist. 5.
The Tahasildar, Amarapuram Mandal, Anantapur dist. 6. V. Jogapa, S/o Siddapa, occ. Agriculture, R/o Amarapur village and mandal, Anantapur District. ... RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No 4 in dismissing the appeal vide No. D. Dios 2016/2014(0) dated 05. 07. 2017 while confirming the patta issued in favour of the respondent No. 6 vide No. 112/2014 dt 19. 02. 2014 which cancelled by this Hon’ble court vide its order dated 11. 9. 2014 in Review WPMP No. 22538/2014 in WP No. 20680/2013 without giving any opportunity as arbitrary and illegal and violative of the Article 16 and 300A of the constitution of India consequently to set aside the proceedings of the respondent No. 4 vide D. Dios 2016/2014(0) dated 5. 7.
2017 and patta issued by the respondent No. 5 in favour of the respondent No. 6 vide No. 112/2014 dt 19. 2. 2014. lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings issued by the respondent No. 4 vide D. Dios 2016/2014(0) dated 05. 07. 2017 and also patta granted vide Rc. No. 112/2014 dt. 19. 02. 2014 issued by the respondent No. 5 pending disposal of the above Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI DADI RADHA KRISHNA (NOT PRESENT) Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No. 6: SRI KISHORE KUMAR A The Court made the following: ORDER !
» APHC010978432018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3299] fM (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI WRIT PETITION NO: 47108/2018 Between: K. mahaboob Khan and Others ... PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ... RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. DADI RADHA KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) i I 2. KISHORE KUMAR. A The Court made the following: Order: The docket orders dated 04. 01. 2023, 27. 01. 2023, 21. 08. 2024 04. 09. 2024 and 18. 09. 2024 are as under: ‘04. 01. 2023 At request of learned counsel for the petitioners, post the matter on 27. 01. 2023. 27. 01. 2023 At request of learned counsel for the petitioners, post on 06. 02. 2023. •^T \ -7 ' iWiSS sisrwsws 21. 08. 2024 At request of learned counsel for the petitioner, list the matter after two weeks. 04. 09. 2024 At request of Sri V. S. K.
Rama Rao, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner, post after two (02) weeks. 18. 09. 2024 At the request of the petitioner’s counsel, the matter is posted to 16. 10. 2024. ” 2. Today, there is no representation for the petitioners 3. The Writ Petition is dismissed for “want of prosecution”. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. Sd/- B. CHITTI JOSEPH //TRUE COPY// ASSISTAN^GISTRAR To, Section officer 1. One CC to Sri Dadi Radha Krishna Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri Kishore Kumar A Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCS to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 4. Three CD Copies TF HIGH COURT DATED: 16/10/2024 ORDER aI 03 MAR 2125 k WP. No. 47108 of 2018 ^ . Current ciecuon DISMISSING THE W. P. FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION, WITHOUT COSTS
Source: High Court of Andhra Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.