P.Sai Kiran and 4 Others v. State of Telangana and Another
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: T.VINOD KUMAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-12-14. P.Sai Kiran and 4 Others v. State of Telangana and Another. Read the judgment and case details...
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITIO N NO: 6199 OF 2020 Between: P,Sai Kiran, S/o. P. Satyana rayana, Aged about 33 years' Occ Business' R/o' 1 H. f. fo zz-aslsrf52, Villa'No. 52'CSK Piestige County, Rallaguda, Shamshabad' Rangareddy District. P. satvanaravana, S/o. Late. Kishtaiah, Aged 62 years, Occ Retd' Govt Service' 2 ''H - 'Prestise csK countv, Rallaguda, it;. N",ir-ettir7s7, Vitla No,52 Shamshabad, RangareddY District. years, Occ Household' 3 P. Narasamma, W/o. P. Satyan arayana, Aged ,Rio' -52 Shamshabad' u. No. ii-asiar752, Villa ruolsz csk Prestige County, Rallaguda, Rangareddy Distrlct. a. q Occ Household' R/o 4 G. tVamatha tr/anjula, W/o Srinivas' years, Plot @ lSe-O N6 r. t". zl, srl e-l"'rurril E'nclave, Road B, Up'parpally, Attapur' Rangareddy District. C. lVadhuri, W/o. C.
Kishore, Aged 30 years, Occ Household' R/o H No 1-4- 5 3}8t22tOtA, Bholakpur, Siddiq Nagar' Hyderabad' ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED AND 'l. StateofTelangana,Rep. byitsPublicProsecutorHighCourt'Hyderabad' 2. P. Pooiitha@Shailaia,W/o. P. Saikiran,Agedabout35yearS,occ. Housewife, -ilo. ri-No. +-z-609, Risala Abdullah, Osmangunj, Hyderabad' petition under secton 482 or cr. P. c ,. , ;i::""""1:)::::J:):-: ,,"r tne H4emoranOum of Grounds oi Criminal Petiti'on, the High. Court m1y. be pleased to qrrrh lh'" proceedings ugrin. t ihJp"titioners/ Accused No. 1 to 5 in Crime No. 576 of )olO"ii'. "2i'-l-O:zO)O"b"in" fite oi W P. S DD. Hyderabad. for the alleged offences prnLniUt" under Sec. 498-4, 506 of IPC & Sec. 4 & 6 of D P Act' t. A. NO : 2 OF 2020 Petition under Section 482 ol cr. P. c praying that in the circumstances stated in the lVlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all proceedings including arrest of the petitio ne rs/accu sed No. 1 to 5 in crime.
No. 576 of 2020 dt. 27t10l2O2O on the file of w. P. s. , DD, Hyderabad, for the alleged offences punishable under Sec,498-A, 506 of lPC, 4 and 6 of D P Act' ThisPetitioncomingonforhearing,uponperusingthelMemorandumof Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri K. V. Janardhan Rao, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and None Appeared for Respondent No 2 The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON,BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR Criminal Petition No. 6199 of 2O2O ORDER: The prcsenl Criminal l)etilion rs fiied under Section 482 ol Cr. P. C. seeking to quash the FtR/Crime No. 576 of 2O2Ct, dated '27 . 1O2-O2O on tht: lilc of Women Policc SLation, DD, Hyder:Lbad lor 498 A and 506 IPC Lhr, rlir:gcd rtl'fc:nces ltltnisttablc tlndcr Sectiol'ls u'her':in tht-and Scctions 4 & 6 of Dou'n' Prohibition Act, pr:tiLioncrs arc ilrray'c-d :-rs tLccLtsecl Nos. 1 to 5. - . l ilirLlrl Sl i li. \'. . .
l l t t I i I t i I I t i L I I Iitto. lc:tl-t'tr'cl c itttnscl Ibr t1'rt A. I Lo A. :r ltncl lcat'llt:cl Aclclitiorlirl Pttblic Prosci:t-tttlt' Pctiliont:rsri :rpll:aring lbr t1'rc l'irsl rcspondcltt-Slatc. Perusccl the InaLcri:rl plirL t'tI ott recitrcl. 3. With the consent of ll. tc lcarncd counsel appearing lor thc pa. rties, the criminal petition is raken up lbr hearing through Vidco Conlrrrt:ncing in lhe virti-tal Clourt 1. od. rY, i. o. , 14. 1,2. 2O2O. 4. The learned counsel for the pctilioners would subrnit that tl-re said crime has been loisted against the petllioners, lnore so agliir-rsl Lhc p(]litioncrs 2 to 5, u,ho arc no \\'a)'connected \\'illh thc- ,::1r-rr1r'rrssi6r-r sl lhc' aLllggccl ()llcrtlcr: Ilsr illyolyccl irl lhc m:,rlrimclnial n. rrrttcrs be t$'een thc firsr petilioncr ancl the cle: lQda complainzrnl/ sccond respondcut. Thc Ic:airncd couttsel lbr the r's rtoitltl lUtLltti sL.
tbnlit Llltrl lllt l-iIst p( liliolicr 1l:is llcr''ll i)('trtior'l( issr-rccl ri'rth ir llotrcc unclr'r Sttc:liot-r 'i I'i\ ol Cr'lr'C to u lrich tllc ii1:il l)('liiioncr' ]'iits :tlrcaclr' 1'urtlishtcl it'tli>l'ma liott as sougllt ftrr Llr lir( l r|rsliqaiinq llg( n( \. ) 5. lt is lurthcr submittt:d br rhe lcarncd counscl lor thc I petitioners that dlrc to thc bchavi(>r ol Lht: s<:cond rcspolldctll, lhc first petitioner rvas forced to lile O. I). No. 899 of 2O2O or-r 08 10 2020 seeking for restitution of conjugal rights. It is submitted that as a counter blast to the said O. P iiled by the first pctitioner, the second respondent has filed the present complaint on 27 . lO.
2020 The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that though tho present criminal pctition is filed seeking for quashing of thc abovc crime rt:gistercd, hc is rcstricting his praycr to rhc limited cxtenl ol cxtcnding protection to the pelitioncrs, b1' dirccting thc rcsponcient authorit-\'- lo issue noticc u/s. 41-A ol Cr'P'C to thc pctitioners 2 to 5 hcrcin , zts in thc r::tsc o[ thr: pr:litionc:r no 1 and also to follo$ thc guridelincs laid ckrrt n [^ tl. rc Ilot-l'blc Suprcmcr Court irr tire case ol Arnesh Kumar u. State oJ Biharl ' 6. On thc othcr h:rnd, thc lcarncd Adclitional lrul>lic l)rosccttlor ri,oulcl submit Lhar sinct: lhc crime rcgistercd agail-lst lht: petitioners is under Sections 498-A and 506 IPC and Sections 4 & 6 of Dowry Prohibition Act, the respondent investigating agency would follow the guidelincs laid down by the l-lon'ble Supreme Court irr Arnesh Kumay's case (supra). 7.
l,earned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the responclent authoritl' rT oulcl lollori thc guidclincs laid clou n t;r tht: IIon'blc Apex Court and ll-rc proccdurr: prcscribccl undr:r Scclioll . 1 l -A ol Cr. P C. (lourt 8 Ilavir-rg regard to tltc submisslrlrls nt:lrlc as ilbovc, tllis llct'tr IS of the vieu, that sincc, the iirsr petitloner has alre:l<11' 'lzota; s scc zz: (]r. P. C, thc resllondent issuec,l with notict-' undcr Scction 41. A of issue notice under Section 41-A of authority is hereby directed to guidelines 5 herein and to follow the Cr. P. C. to the petitioners 2 to Kumar's case issued by t. he Apex court in Arnesh lsurpa)' g. criminal is Subject to thc above direction, thc: Petition petitions' if an1,, pcnding in thrs cl isposcr. l oi. Misccllancous c rim in:rl ctition shall starn cl closccl. Jr RULU sD/'cj'iYS+mrF:Hrt //TRUE COPY// SECTIO OFFICER To Nampallv' Hvderabad' Metropol(an 1. The Xlll Additional Chief l"l? 9lt-tlll"^" WPS' DD' HyderaDao i. fh.
Strt,on House Officer' at of Telangana prot"t'i"t'"fiig'h Co'l't fot the State 3. Two CCs to Public Hvderabad. IoPUC] v. Janardhan Rao' Advocate 4 lill tc","! t, K 5 Two CD Copies \i-- HIGH COURT DATED:1411212020 1 HE s r4 * ) o O 0 2 JAI\, 2021 * * P4Tc',{c-A ORDER CRLP. No. 6199 of 2020 DTSPOSING OF THE CRL. PETITION. . std )! bo
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.