AKASH @ SANJU v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
Court: High Court of Punjab and Haryana
Bench: MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Punjab and Haryana judgment dated 2025-09-30. AKASH @ SANJU v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
CRM-M-55209 of 2025 IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-55209 of 2025 Date of Decision: 30. 09. 2025 Akash @ Sanju ….. Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present: Mr. Kartik, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Mahima Yashpal Singla, Sr. DAG, Haryana. NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL) 1. Instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023 seeking quashing of FIR No. 24 dated 21. 08. 2025 registered under Sections 64(2)(m), 65(1), 77, 78, 351(3) of the BNS, 2023 and Sections 4(2), 6, 10, 12 of the POCSO Act, 2012 (lateron Section 238b of the BNS was added) at Police Station Women Police Station Hisar, District Hisar, and all other subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 16. 09. 2025 (Annexure P-2). 2.
Learned State counsel, who appears on receipt of advance copy of the paperbook, on instructions from ASI Gursevak, submits that the matter is at the investigation stage only. The case of the petitioner is that the matter has been compromised between the parties. CRM-M-55209 of 2025 3. Since the impugned FIR is at the investigation stage, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the investigating officer with regard to the compromise entered between the parties. 4. Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. 5. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the original copy of the compromise dated 16. 09. 2025 has been annexed with the petition as Annexure P-2 and the same may be returned to the petitioner. 6. Registry is directed to return the original copy of compromise deed dated 16. 09. 2025 (Annexue P-2) to the petitioner by retaining the photostat copy on the record. 30. 09. 2025 (NAMIT KUMAR) R. S.
JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.