ROHAN THAKUR v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
Court: High Court of Meghalaya
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Meghalaya judgment dated 2026-04-23. ROHAN THAKUR v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Serial No. 03 Supp. List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG MC[WP(C)]. No. 130 of 2026 in WP(C). No. 9 of 2026 (disposed of) Date of Decision: 23. 04. 2026 Shri. Rohan Thakur Aged about 23 years S/o. Kashi Nath Thakur, Madanriting Block-D, Shillong, Dist. East Khasi Hills, Meghalaya, Pin – 793021. …Applicant -Versus- 1. The Union of India, Represented by Secretary to the Govt. of India, Ministry of Employment, Public Grievance & Pension. Block S. 12, Central Office Campus, Ludhi Road, New Delhi-110003. 2. The Review Medical Examination Board of Recruitment Board Represented by its Presiding Officer, Composit Hospital, BSF, Shillong, Meghalaya Pin-793012. 3. The Staff Selection Commission (SSC), Government of India, Ministry of Employment, Public Grievance & Pension, Represented by its Chairman, SSC Headquarters, New Delhi-110003. 4. The Government of India, represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi-110001. 5.
The Director General, Central Armed Police Forces, New Delhi-110001. 6. The Detailed Medical Examination Board, Composit Hospital, BSF, Shillong, Meghalaya, Pin-793012. ... Opposite Parties Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Mr. M. H. Choudhury, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Dr. N. Mozika, DSGI with Ms. M. Myrthong, Adv. i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc: ii) Whether approved for publication Yes/No in press: JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL) 1. Heard Mr. M. H. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. This is an application for recall of the order dated 08-04-2026, passed in WP(C). No. 9 of 2026, whereby the writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution. 3. Perused the reasons set out in the application. The writ petitioner having made out sufficient cause for non-appearance, the matter stands restored to file. 4. Misc. case is allowed and disposed of. Judge
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.