Skip to main content
LawSphereX

PDIANGHUN SHYLLA v. STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS.

Court: High Court of Meghalaya

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Meghalaya judgment dated 2026-09-07. PDIANGHUN SHYLLA v. STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

Serial No. 30 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C). No. 340 of 2026 Date of Decision: 07. 09. 2026 Smt. Pdianghun Shylla, W/o Shri. Clinton Lamin, Aged abour 28 years, Resident of H. No. 129, Diwon, Vill-Diwon, District: Ri-Bhoi, Meghalaya – 793102. …Petitioner -Versus- 1. State of Tamil Nadu through Cyber Crime Police Station, Keezhkuppam – 606301. 2. The Branch Manager, Meghalaya Rural Bank, Branch MRB Umden Branch, Ri-Bhoi District – 793102, Meghalaya. 3. The State of Meghalaya, through the Secretary to the Government of Meghalaya, Home (Police) Department, Main Secretariat, Shillong, Meghalaya – 793 001. 4. The Officer-in-Charge, Nongpoh Police Station, District Ri-Bhoi, Meghalaya – 793102. …Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Mr. S. Thapa, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. P. Dey, Adv. for R 2. Ms. A. D. Syiem, GA for R 3 & 4.

i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc: ii) Whether approved for publication Yes/No in press: JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL) 1. Mr. P. Dey, learned counsel has entered appearance today on behalf of the respondent No. 2, and Ms. A. D. Syiem, learned GA is present on behalf of the respondents No. 3 & 4, however, none is present on behalf of the respondent No. 1. 2. Mr. P. Dey, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 today submits that the matter can be closed and the account of the writ petitioner, while keeping the lien amount of ₹6500/-, can be defreezed. 3. Mr. S. Thapa, learned counsel for the petitioner also concurs to the submissions of Mr. P. Dey, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the account of the writ petitioner be defrozen, and only the lien amount of ₹6500/- be kept in abeyance. 5. As ordered above, the writ petition stands closed and disposed of. Judge

Source: High Court of Meghalaya. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.