Skip to main content
LawSphereX

Ranjeet Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Court: Patna High Court

Bench: MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY

Judgment date:

Case summary

Patna High Court judgment dated 2025-12-11. Ranjeet Kumar v. The State of Bihar. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 36375 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No. -448 Year-2023 Thana- RANIGANJ District- Araria ====================================================== Ranjeet Kumar S/o Birendra Yadav Vill. - Madhu Tola, Ward No. 2, Panchayat- Barbanna, PS- Raniganj, Distt. - Araria ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gopal Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 4 11-12-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 395 of the Indian Penal Code, registered in connection with Raniganj P. S. Case No. 448 of 2023. 3. As per allegation, three miscreants on motor-cycles stopped the informant.

They snatched Rs. 45,000/- and a sliver chain and also a mobile set from the possession of the informant. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated. His name has figured in the confessional statement of co-accused Manohar Yadav and Raushan Yadav. Except the confessional statements, there is nothing against the petitioner. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 36375 of 2025(4) dt. 11-12-2025 2/2 5. It appears that co-accused persons were arrested in connection with Raniganj P. S. Case No 456/2023 and the silver chain of the informant was recovered from their possession. They confessed their guilt and also named the present petitioner 6. Since the petitioner has criminal antecedents of similar nature, he does not deserve the privilege of anticipatory bail which is hereby rejected. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) HR/- U T

Source: Patna High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.