R. CHAMAPPA S/O T.R. RANGANAIK v. THE COMMISSIONER
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: M.G.S. KAMAL
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2024-07-08. R. CHAMAPPA S/O T.R. RANGANAIK v. THE COMMISSIONER. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
- 1 - WP No. 60831 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH TH DATED THIS THE 8 DAY OF JULY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. G. S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 60831 OF 2011(S-DIS) BETWEEN: R. CHAMAPPA S/O. T. R. RANGANAIK, AGE: 60 YEARS, OCCUP: RETD SECOND DIVISION ASSISTANT, HUBLI-DHARWAD, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, HUBBALLI. …PETITIONER (BY SRI ANANT P. SAVADI, ADVOCATE – ABSENT) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER, HUBLI-DHARWAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, HUBBALLI – 580 020. 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY ITS SECERTARY TO GOVT. , URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPATMENT, VIKAS SOUDHA, BANGALORE – 560 001. Digitally signed by V N BADIGER Location: High Court of 3. ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR, ENQUIRIES-1, Karnataka KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA, BANGALORE. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI R. H. ANGADI, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI ANIL KALE, ADVOCATE FOR R3; SRI P. N.
HATTI, HCGP FOR R2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER KIND OF WRIT OR WRIT TO QUASH THE ST ORDER NO. HDMC 22 GAE 98 DATED:30/08/2010 PASSED BY THE 1 RESPONDENT, THE COPY OF WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A, RD BY ALSO QUASHING THE ENQUIRY REPORT OF THE 3 RESPONDENT DATED:12/09/2005 AND NO LOK/ARE-1/ENQ- 60/2022-23 IN ANNEXURE-G AND ETC. , - 2 - WP No. 60831 of 2011 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING - B GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER 1. On 28. 05. 2024 after hearing the respective counsel appearing for the parties, this Court had directed the learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 & 3 to secure the records relating to the enquiry of the petitioner. 2. Matter was thereafter listed on 05. 06. 2024, 12. 06. 2024, and on 25. 06. 2024, on all these dates, learned counsel for the petitioner has remained absent. There has been no representation. 3.
Learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 & 3 on the order hand has secured the records, as directed by this Court. On 25. 06. 2024 taking note of the continuous absence of the learned counsel of the petitioner, this Court had directed that the matter to be listed today with a specific direction that, if there was no representation, appropriate orders, including dismissal of the petition for non-prosecution would be passed. - 3 - WP No. 60831 of 2011 4. Even today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. The matter is pending since 2011 and it is clear that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this matter. Accordingly, petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- JUDGE VNP*/CT-ASC List No. : 1 Sl No. : 8
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.