Ganta VN Gandhi v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: P NAVEEN RAO
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-09-18. Ganta VN Gandhi v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 15393 OF 2020 Between: 1. Ganta VN Gandhi, S/o. Late. G. Sriramulu, Aged 38 Years, Occ: Housewife 2. Ganta Ramadevi, W/o. Ganta VN Gandhi, Age 30, Occ: House Wife 3. G Mangamma, W/o G. Santosh Kumar, Aged 32 years, Occ: House Wife, All are the R/o. 7-1-304, Flat 101, Balaji Apts, Block A, B. K. Guda, SR Nagar, HYderabad 5ooo38 ... PET. r. NERS AND 1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by the Principal Secretary, Home Department, TS Secretariat, Hyderabad 2 The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad Police Commissionerate, Gachibowli, Hyderabad 3 Vijay Bhaskar Reddy, S/o Not known the Petitioner, Aged major, Occ: lnspector of Police, Economic Offences Wing, Cyberabad Police Commissionerate 4 Office of the Economic Offices Wing, Cyberabad Police Commissionerate, Gachibowli' Hvderabad ...
RES'.
NDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or orders more particularly one in the nature of writ of lVandamus declaring the action of the respondents particularly 3rd respondent herein and calling the petitioners to the 4th respondent's police station as illegal, arbitrary, u nco nstitutio na I and agarnst well violated principles of the law and consequently direct the 3'd respondent to not to call the petitioners to the 4'h Respondent police station and not to harass the petitioners in any manner without following due process of law, lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the 3'd respondents to not to harass the petitioners rn any manner without followrng due process of law pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI U. D. JAI BHIMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1,2 & 4: AGp FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No. 3: - The Court made the following: ORDER HOIioURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RA,() \,/RIT PETITION NO. 15393 OF 2O2O CRDER: Hcard lear:rei counsel lor petitioners and lcru nc,rl Assistant Governmenl Irleader for Home 02. This rvrrt petition is filed alleging that the lnsF,ect,rr of Police, Economic offences Wing, Cyberabad Police Comrri ssionerate is calling the pet. tioners to the 4th respondent-polit:e station and harassing them without any justification, even thougl-r no crime is regrstered again st them. O3. On instructions, Iearned Assistant Governnrent Pleader informs the C( urt that based on the complaint locllled bl one Smt. T. Nagama. r i on 10-09-2020, Crime No. 460 c,l' 2020 u,as registered in Se nathnagar Police Station undcr Se <:[ior^. s 406, 42O IPC read ll'ith Section 5 of The Telangana Protectiot. t of Depositors and Financia.
E stablisl-rments Act' and later crimc r;z,s transl'erred to Econorric {11[e nces Wing of Cl,berabad policc Co rmissioncrate . ln tl're saici crine, petitioners \['ere named as accu:er] as reported by the complair ant. 04. Since r::rime is already registered and trar sl'elred to the Economic Oflettces Wing, it cannot be said that p':tLtioners are called to the police station without any justification When a cognizable crin. e is reported, the police have to investigate and in the process of investigation, the police can questiorl trle accr-tsed lt in is needless 1o observo that police shall follow duc ;''rl>ccdurc conducting r 11\,,rs tigal. ion into the crrme. -) 05. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. pending miscellaneous petilions, itany, shall stand closed. SD/. B. SATYAVATHI ASSISTANT REG //TRUE COPY// SECTI N OFFICER To '1 . One CC to Sri U. D. Jai Bhima Rao, Advocate [OPUC] 2, Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court for the State of Telangana [OUT] 3. Two CD Copies.
A/P HIGH COUFII' DATED:18109,t2020 1H€ S tr( k 0, //. yS ORDER t' s0sEPm20 z ffi WP. No. 15393 rr1' 2020 \ * * ,, r. Sp rr. o DISMISSING T'HE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COISTS )l. o)-o'
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.