VITHTHALBHAI TALSIBHAI SAVANI v. STATE OF GUJARAT
Court: High Court of Gujarat
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA M. SAREEN
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Gujarat judgment dated 2020-12-21. VITHTHALBHAI TALSIBHAI SAVANI v. STATE OF GUJARAT. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
R/SCR. A/7295/2020 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 7295 of 2020 ========================================================== VITHTHALBHAI TALSIBHAI SAVANI Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ========================================================== Appearance: A R ROCKEY(7592) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 KHUSHI P JADAV(7351) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR. HARDEEP L MAHIDA(7112) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3 MR. J. K. SHAH, APP (2) for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA M. SAREEN Date : 21/12/2020 ORAL ORDER Present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for appropriate writ, order and / or direction to direct the respondents to registered the FIR in pursuance of the written complaint dated 05. 07. 2020 made at Manjalpur Police Station, Vadodara.
Learned advocate for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has made a written complaint dated 05. 07. 2020 to the respondent No. 2 and if the respondent No. 2 is directed to consider the said complaint, the petitioner would be satisfied at this stage and does not press for the relief prayed in this petition at this stage. Having heard the learned advocates for the respective R/SCR. A/7295/2020 ORDER parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the opinion that if the respondent No. 2 – Police Inspector, Manjalpur Police Station, Vadodara is directed to consider the complaint of the petitioner, the ends of justice would be met. In the result, the respondent No. 2 – Police Inspector, Manjalpur Police Station, Vadodara is hereby directed to consider the written complaint of the petitioner dated 05. 07. 2020, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four weeks.
With the above direction, present petition stands disposed of. It is hereby clarified that this Court has not gone into the merits of the matter. Direct service is permitted, to be served through e-mail. (RAJENDRA M. SAREEN,J) MOHMMEDSHAHID
Source: High Court of Gujarat. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.