VINOD KUMAR SHARMA v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2024-01-24. VINOD KUMAR SHARMA v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJEEV S KALGAONKAR th ON THE 24 OF JANUARY, 2024 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 49735 of 2023 BETWEEN:- VINOD KUMAR SHARMA S/O SHRI RAMESHWAR DAYAL SHARMA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O GRAM UAPMANYU KA PURA MAJRA KARWAS THANA MOW TEH GOHAD DISTRICT BHIND (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... APPLICANT (SHRI PRADEEP KATARE - ADVOCATE) AND THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH POLICE THANA MOW DISTRICT BHIND (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... RESPONDENTS (SHRI PRAMOD KUMAR PACHORI - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR) This application coming on for hearing this day, the court passed the following: ORDER This second bail application has been filed by the applicant under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of anticipatory bail, who is apprehending his arrest in connection with Crime No. 182/2023 registered at Police Station Mow, District Bhind (M. P. ) for offence punishable under Sections 308, 294 and 34 IPC.
The first bail application was dismissed as withdrawn with a request that direction may be issued to the Investigation Officer to comply with the directions of the Supreme Court in cases of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar (2014) 8 SCC 273 and Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of investigation (2022) 10 SCC 51. Accordingly, Signature Not Verified Signed by: VIJAY TRIPATHI Signing time: 25-01-2024 01:11:09 PM application was dismissed with aforesaid direction. Despite directions, applicant is apprehending his arrest. As per the Status Report submitted by the Investigation Officer, certain inquiry with regard to arm used in the alleged offence is to be made, but applicant has not been available for the purpose of investigation. Heard. Considered. Perused the case diary. First application was withdrawn with certain directions vide order dated 13. 09. 2023. Applicant has not been arrested till date, further he has not been available for the purpose of investigation.
In such a scenario, no further directions are required in the matter. This second application filed under Section 438 of CrPC sans merit is hereby dismissed. (SANJEEV S KALGAONKAR) JUDGE Vijay Signature Not Verified Signed by: VIJAY TRIPATHI Signing time: 25-01-2024 01:11:09 PM
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.