AZMAL ANSARI ALIAS AJMAL ALIAS AJMAL ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2020-12-14. AZMAL ANSARI ALIAS AJMAL ALIAS AJMAL ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case details...
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 9651 of 2020 Azmal Ansari @ Ajmal @ Ajmal Ansari … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Lalit Yadav, Adv. For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Addl. P. P. 02 /14. 12. 2020 Heard the parties through video conferencing. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter within two weeks after the lockdown is over. In view of personal undertaking given by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter are ignored for the present. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P. S. Case No. 69 of 2019 registered under sections 419/420/467/468/471/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code read with sections 66(B)/66(C)/66(D)/84(C) of IT Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed cybercrime and from his house, the police seized mobile phones, SIM Cards, ATM Cards and cash of Rs. 50,000/-. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that co-accused, with similar allegation, has been admitted to bail by the Co-ordinate Bench vide order dated 07. 01. 2020 passed in B. A. No. 12004 of 2019. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 25. 07. 2020 as mentioned in paragraph 13 of the bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P. P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.
25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P. S. Case No. 69 of 2019 with the condition that he will cooperate with the trial of the case. Pappu/ (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J. )
Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.