Skip to main content
LawSphereX

MOHAN LAL MOLAT v. BOARD OF REVENUE

Court: High Court of Rajasthan

Bench: YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2026-08-10. MOHAN LAL MOLAT v. BOARD OF REVENUE. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

[2026:RJ-JP:38120] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16005/2026 CNR: RJHC010711922026 | URN: CW / 28625U / 2026 Mohan Lal Molat S/o Kewal Ram, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Village Lambabhatda, Post Chundawada, Tehsil Bichhiwara, District Dungarpur (Raj. ). ----Petitioner Versus 1. Board Of Revenue, Through The Registrar, Ajmer, District Ajmer, Rajasthan. 2. Registrar, Board Of Revenue, Ajmer, District Ajmer, Rajasthan. 3. Divisional Commissioner, Udaipur, District Udaipur, Rajasthan. 4. District Collector (Land Record), Dungarpur, District Dungarpur, Rajasthan. 5. The Tehsildar, Bichhiwara, District Dungarpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ramesh Kumar Prajapat For Respondent(s) : Mr. S. R. Paliwal, Dy. GC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT Order 10/08/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been assigned the duties of incharge of Census 2027 vide orders dated 30. 12. 2025 and 5. 1. 2026.

He further submits that the Home Secretary, Govt. of India has issued communication dated 11. 03. 2026 wherein it is mentioned that the officers who are deputed for Census 2027 may not be transferred. Further, no circle has been allotted to the petitioner and he has been shown to be transferred to Leave Reserve, Land Record Section, District [2026:RJ-JP:38120] (2 of 2) [CW-16005/2026] Collectorate, Dungarpur. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner may be permitted to file a representation before the respondents which may be directed to be decided expeditiously. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the transfer order has been passed in administrative exigency and if the petitioner is aggrieved, he can file representation before the respondents, who will consider the representation on the grounds raised by the petitioner in an expeditious manner and this petition can be disposed at this stage. 3. Heard. 4.

Taking into consideration the grievance raised herein, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the petitioner to file his representation before the respondents within a period of seven days from today and the respondents shall decide the representation within a period of fifteen days thereafter, strictly in accordance with law by way of passing a speaking order. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. 6. Till the decision of the representation, the impugned transfer order dated 10. 07. 2026 shall remain stayed qua the petitioner, if the petitioner has not joined at the new place of posting. 7. It is made clear that if the petitioner fails to file a representation within a period of seven days from today, the interim order granted by this Court shall stand vacated automatically. (YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J 43/Rajesh Prajapat

Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.