M/S. ACC LOGISTICS v. UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS.
Court: High Court of Meghalaya
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Meghalaya judgment dated 2026-08-10. M/S. ACC LOGISTICS v. UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Serial No. 36 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C) No. 610 of 2025 Date of Decision: 10. 08. 2026 M/s ACC Logistics, registered office at 40, st GIRISH PARK (NORTH), 1 Floor, Suite # 01, Kolkata-700006, Represented by Shri Ajay Kumar Viswakarma, aged about 44 years, S/o Late Kumar Viswakarma R/o Viswakarma Nibash-Karbi, Dehal path, P. O. Narangi, P. S. Noonmati, Birkusi, Narangi-781026. …. Petitioner(s) Versus 1. Union of India represented by The Home Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, North Block New Delhi-110001 2. The Director General (HQ) of Assam Rifles, Laitkor Shillong, Meghalaya- PIN 793010. 3. The Major General, Chief Vigilance Officer, in the office of the 793010 HQ Director General of Assam Rifles, Laitkor, Shillong, Meghalaya- PIN 793010. 4. The Lieutenant General, Directorate General of Assam Rifles, Govt. of India, Shillong-793010. 5.
The Lieutenant Colonel, Staff Officer-1 (Transport) For Commandant (Q), Ministry of Home Affairs, Directorate General of Assam Rifles, Govt. of India Shillong-793010. …. Respondent(s) _________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner(s) : None For the Respondent(s) : Dr. N. Mozika, DSGI with Ms. M. Myrchiang, Adv. i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc: ii) Whether approved for publication Yes/No in press: JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL) 1. As the earlier counsel has withdrawn from the matter, this Court vide order dated 23. 06. 2026, had directed the Registry to issue notice to inform the petitioner. Though notice was issued, the same has returned unserved, and there is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Accordingly, the matter stands dismissed, for non-prosecution. 3.
This order has been passed in view of the fact that the petitioner was earlier represented by a counsel, and there is no excuse for non-appearance. JUDGE Meghalaya 10. 08. 2026 “V. Lyndem-AR-PS” Signature Not Verified Page 2 of 2 Digitally signed by VALENTINO LYNDEM Date: 2026. 08. 10 13:11:41 IST
Source: High Court of Meghalaya. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.