INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENT BANK OF INDIA v. THE WEST COST PAPER MILLS LTD.,
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: JYOTI MULIMANI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2024-08-01. INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENT BANK OF INDIA v. THE WEST COST PAPER MILLS LTD.,. Read the judgment and case...
Judgment text
- 1 - RFA No. 100199 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH ST DATED THIS THE 1 DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 100199 OF 2014 (MON) BETWEEN: 1. INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENT BANK OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, NO. 19, NETAJI SUBHAS CHANDRA ROAD, KOLKATTA, REP. BY LIQUIDATOR OF INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENT, BANK OF INDIA LTD. , SHRI RAM NARAYAN DHAR S/O BISWESWAR DHAR, AGE: 60 YEARS, R/O: KOLKATTA. 2. INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENT BANK OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS MANAGER, TH NO. 603, 6 FLOOR, MANIPAL CENTER, 4 DICKENSON ROAD, Digitally signed by BENGALURU, THEJASKUMAR N REP. BY LIQUIDATOR OF Location: HIGH INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENT, BANK OF INDIA, COURT OF KARNATAKA SHRI RAM NARAYANA DHAR S/O BISWESWAR DHAR, AGE: 60 YEARS, R/O: KOLKATTA. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. S. V. YAJI. , ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: THE WEST COST PAPER MILLS LTD. , A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER COMPANIES ACT 1913, - 2 - RFA No. 100199 of 2014 REP.
BY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, SHRI K. L. CHANDAK, AGE: 65 YEARS, AT REGISTERED OFFICE BANGUR NAGAR, DHANDELI, TQ: HALIYALA, DIST: KARWAR. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SUJEET. S. HIREMATH. , ADVOCATE FOR SRI. JAGADISH PATIL. , ADVOCATE) THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL FILED UNDER SECTION 96 R/W ORDER XLI RULE 1 AND 2 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants, either personally or through video conferencing. Sri. Sujeet S. Hiremath. , learned counsel on behalf of Sri. Jagadish Patil. , for the respondent has appeared in person. As could be seen from the appeal papers, the appeal is filed in the year 2014. Now we are in the month of August 2024. The appeal is pending from ten years. As already noted above, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants, either - 3 - RFA No.
100199 of 2014 personally or through video conferencing. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN LIST NO. : 3 SL NO. : 19
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.