Skip to main content
LawSphereX

Union of India and 4 Others v. Md Riyaj Ahmad

Court: High Court of Manipur

Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE GOLMEI GAIPHULSHILLU KABUI

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Manipur judgment dated 2024-12-10. Union of India and 4 Others v. Md Riyaj Ahmad. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

Digitally signed by SHAMURAILATPAM SUSHIL SHAMURAILATPAM SUSHIL SHARMA P a g e | 1 SHARMA Date: 2024. 12. 10 16:54:00 +05'30' Item No. 37 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL MC(WA) No. 76 of 2024 Union of India and 4 Others …Applicants - Versus - Md. Riyaj Ahmad …Respondent B E F O R E HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. D. KRISHNAKUMAR HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE GOLMEI GAIPHULSHILLU KABUI O R D E R 10-12-2024 D. Krishnakumar (C. J. ), Mr. W. Darakishwor, learned Sr. PCCG, appears for the applicant and Mr. Kh. Tarunkumar, learned senior counsel appears on for the respondent through video conferencing. The present application has been filed on behalf of the applicant praying as follows : “20.

That, in the premises stated above, the Hon’ble Court may be graciously pleased to : consider the reasons given in the foregoing paras and circumstances stated therein as the sufficient cause for condoning the unintentional delay of 74 days only in preferring the Writ Appeal under reference and the same be heard on merits after condoning the delay as the ends of justice may call for. ” P a g e | 2 We have gone through the reasons given in the application for condoning the delay in filing the connected appeal and this Court has satisfied the reasons given in the application. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent also has made no serious objection in allowing the condonation application. Therefore, considering the submissions made by the counsel appearing for the parties and the reasons given in the application, the delay of 74 days in filing the Writ Appeal is condoned. The application is accordingly disposed of.

The Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is found to be in order and list the appeal for admission. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Sushil

Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.