MUKHTYAR SINGH AND ANR. v. F.A.SHAH SECY.EDU.DEPTT.AND ANR.
Court: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jammu and Kashmir judgment dated 2024-09-20. MUKHTYAR SINGH AND ANR. v. F.A.SHAH SECY.EDU.DEPTT.AND ANR. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
Sr. No. 53 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CPSW No. 444/2017 In SWP No. 2223/2021 1. Mukhtyar Singh, age 47 years …. Appellant/Petitioner(s) S/o Sh. Romal Singh R/o Vilage Dhanoo, Tikri, Udhampur. 2. Sudesh Kumar S/o Late Sh. Paras Ram R/o Village Seen Brahamana, Tikri, Udhampur. Through :- None. V/s 1. Farooq Ahmad Shah, IAS …. Respondent(s) Commissioner/Secretary to Government, School Education Department J&K Government, Civil Secretariat, Srinagar. 2. S. Ravinder Singh, Director School Education Department, Jammu Muthi, Jammu Through :- Ms. Aparna Gupta, Advocate vice Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG. Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER 20. 09. 2024 01. The instant contempt petition arising out of the order/judgment dated 27. 01. 2017 whereby a direction has been issued to the petitioners to file a representation before the respondents and subject to filing of the said representation, a direction was issued to the respondents to accord consideration.
02. Record reveals that the contempt petition was listed way back on 04. 02. 2019 and none was appeared on behalf of the petitioners on that date and after a period of more than five years the instant contempt petition has now been listed before this Court. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. 03. On asking of the Court Ms. Aparna Gupta, Advocate appearing vice Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG has caused appearance on behalf of the respondents. 04. Thus, the instant contempt petition is disposed of at this stage, with a direction to the respondents to comply the order/judgment dated 27. 01. 2017 passed by this Court, if the same has not complied as on date, within a period of four weeks’ from today. 05. In the aforesaid backdrop, nothing remains to be adjudicated any further in the instant contempt petition and proceedings in the instant contempt petition are accordingly closed. The instant contempt petition, is accordingly, ‘disposed of’.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge Jammu: 20. 09. 2024 Renu Renu Bala 2024. 09. 26 09:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.