Skip to main content
LawSphereX

YASHPAL SINGH SANDHU v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

Court: High Court of Himachal Pradesh

Bench: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTSNA REWAL DUA

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Himachal Pradesh judgment dated 2025-10-17. YASHPAL SINGH SANDHU v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 16342/2025 Decided on: 17. 10. 2025 Yashpal Singh …Petitioner Versus State of H. P. & Ors. . …Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. 1 Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Abhimanyu Rathor, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L. N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J Petitioner is a Communication & Technical Services official in the respondents-Police Department. Vide office order dated 24. 07. 2025, he was transferred from PRS Daroh to CTS Headquarters Workshop Shimla. Petitioner preferred representation against the above office order to respondent No. 2/competent authority on 25. 07. 2025. He, thereafter, instituted Yashpal Singh 2 Sandhu Vs. State of H. P. & Ors. The said petition was disposed of with direction to the respondents to consider & decide the representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law.

Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes CWP No. 13355/2025 decided on 20. 08. 2025 2. The petitioner assailed the decision dated 24. 07. 2025 3 by instituting Yashpal Singh Sandhu Vs. State of H. P. & Ors. During the pendency of the said appeal, respondent No. 2/competent authority passed an office order dated 09. 10. 2025, rejecting petitioner’s representation giving reasons in support thereof. 3 3. In view of above, Yashpal Singh Sandhu was also disposed of on 10. 10. 2025. 4. In the instant petition, the petitioner has now laid challenge to the office order dated 09. 10. 2025, whereby his representation was rejected. 5. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the present petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge th 17 October, 2025(rohit) LPA No. 658/2025 decided on 10. 10.

2025

Source: High Court of Himachal Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.