RAJESH.S v. SRI. M.P.DINESH , IPS,
Court: High Court of Kerala
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Kerala judgment dated 2020-12-21. RAJESH.S v. SRI. M.P.DINESH , IPS,. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K. NARENDRAN MONDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2020 / 30TH AGRAHAYANA, 1942 Con. Case(C). No. 598 OF 2020 IN WP(C). 19489/2019 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 19489/2019(I) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER/S: RAJESH. S, AGED 50 YEARS S/O SIVAN P. V, CONDUCTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, MUVATTUPUZHA DEPOT (RESIDING AT PRASEEDA BHAVAN, THRIKKALATHOOR P. O. MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN-683 557). BY ADV. SRI. K. P. JUSTINE (KARIPAT) RESPONDENT/S: SRI. M. P. DINESH , IPS, (AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER ), MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, EAST FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 023. Additional R2 SRI. BIJU PRABHAKAR, IAS(AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, EAST FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM (ADDITIONAL R2 IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 25.
11. 2020 IN IA. No. 1/2020 IN COC 598/2020. ) OTHER PRESENT: SRI T. P. SAJAN- STANDING COUNSEL , KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21. 12. 2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -2- Cont. case (C). No. 598 of 2020 JUDGMENT The petitioner has filed this Contempt of Court case alleging non-compliance of the directions contained in Annexure A1 judgment of this Court dated 19. 08. 2019 in W. P. (C). No. 19489 of 2019, whereby that writ petition was disposed of by directing the respondent herein to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext. P2 representation made by the petitioner regarding non-payment of leave salary arrears, strictly in accordance with law, with notice to the petitioner, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of that judgment. 2. On 12. 03.
2020, when this Contempt Case came up for admission, the learned Standing Counsel for KSRTC sought time to get instructions. 3. On 25. 11. 2020, when this Contempt Case came up for consideration, the petitioner filed I. A. No. 1 of 2020 seeking an order to implead the present Managing Director of KSRTC nd as the additional 2 respondent. The said application was -3- Cont. case (C). No. 598 of 2020 allowed and the learned Standing Counsel for KSRTC nd submitted that the additional 2 respondent will pass appropriate orders, within a period of ten days. The said submission was recorded. 4. On 08. 12. 2020, the learned Standing Counsel for KSRTC submitted that a decision has already been taken pursuant to the direction contained in Annexure A1 judgment of this Court and that the admissible amount shall be disbursed to the petitioner, within a week. 5.
Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned Standing Counsel for KSRTC would submit that the direction contained in Annexure A1 judgment of this Court has already been complied with. In such circumstances, the Contempt Case is closed recording the aforesaid submission made by the learned Standing Counsel for KSRTC. Sd/- ANIL K. NARENDRAN JUDGE das -4- Cont. case (C). No. 598 of 2020 -5- Cont. case (C). No. 598 of 2020 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE A1 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 19. 8. 2019 IN WPC NO 19489/19 ANNEXURE A2 TRUE COPY OF THE FORWARDING LETTER DATED 18. 9. 2019 ANNEXURE A3 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 25. 3. 2019
Source: High Court of Kerala. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.