V.Saravanan v. Deputy Superintendent of Police
Court: Madras High Court
Bench: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
Madras High Court judgment dated 2026-04-27. V.Saravanan v. Deputy Superintendent of Police. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
CRL OP No. 10462 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR CRL OP No. 10462 of 2026 1. V. Saravanan 2. Anjalai 3. V. Chandru 4. N. Muniyammal 5. N. Vijayakumar .. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Deputy Superintendent of Police Uthiramerur, Kancheepuram District. 2. State rep. by The Sub Inspector of Police Salavakkam Police Station, Kancheepuram District. (Crime No. 25/2026) 3. Yogalakshmi .. Respondent(s) To direct the Principal District Sessions Judge at Kanchipuram District to consider the bail application sympathetically and pass orders on the merits of the same day on the petitioners’ surrender in connection with Cr. No. 25/2026 pending before the respondents police, and pass such other orders. __________ Page1 of 5 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis CRL OP No. 10462 of 2026 For Petitioner(s): Mr. T. Panchatsaram For Respondent(s): Mr. L. Baskaran, Govt. Advocate (Crl.
Side) ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the Principal District Sessions Judge at Kanchipuram District to consider the petitioners’ bail application sympathetically and pass orders on merits on the same day as their surrender in connection with Cr. No. 25 of 2026 pending before the respondents police. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents 1 and 2. 3. The defacto complainant belongs to Scheduled Caste community. The first petitioner and the defacto complainant were in love with each other and subsequently got married in a Temple on 26. 12. 2025 and lived a happy life. Subsequently, the first petitioner along with the other petitioners, who are her in-laws, allegedly assaulted the defacto complainant, drove her out of the matrimonial home, and also abused her by referring to her caste name. __________ Page2 of 5 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis CRL OP No.
10462 of 2026 4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case. 5. In view of the above factual position, there shall be a direction to the Principal District Sessions Judge at Kanchipuram to consider the petitioners' bail application, preferably on the same day of their surrender, in connection with Crime No. 25 of 2026 on the file of the second respondent Police and to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after affording due opportunity to the victims under Section 15-A of the SC/ST (PoA) Act, 1989. The petitioners shall surrender before the jurisdictional Court concerned within a period of fifteen days from the date of the receipt of a copy of this order. 6. The Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of accordingly. 27-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No PVS __________ Page3 of 5 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis CRL OP No. 10462 of 2026 To 1.
The Principal District Sessions Judge, Kanchipuram 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Uthiramerur, Kancheepuram District 3. The Inspector of Police Salavakkam Police Station, Kancheepuram District. (Crime No. 25/2026) 4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. __________ Page4 of 5 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis CRL OP No. 10462 of 2026 M. NIRMAL KUMAR, J. PVS CRL OP No. 10462 of 2026 27-04-2026 __________ Page5 of 5 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis
Source: Madras High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.