Rajesh Rawtani alias Raj Dixit v. R Pramila Bai
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: G SRI DEVI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-12-22. Rajesh Rawtani alias Raj Dixit v. R Pramila Bai. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1281 OF 2014 Petition under Article 227 o'f the Constitution of lndia, against the Order dated. 26. 03. 2014 N/ade in l. ANo. 690 of 2014 in O. S. No. 477 ol 2O13 on the file of the ll Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, at Hyderabad. Between: Ra. jesh Rawtani alias Raj Dixit, S/o Ramachand Rawtani, Occ;- Business, R/o H. No. A2, Plot No. 10, [t4anleera Residency, Journalist Colony, Jubille Hills, Hyderabad. ... Petitioner/Res pondent No. 1 AND '1 . R Pramila Bai, W/o Late Balkishan Singh, Occ:- Housewife, R/o Plot No. 16, Durgavihar Colony, Gun Rock Enclave, Trimulghery, Secund era bad-500 015. 2. lr,4ahesh Singh, S/o Late Balkishan Singh, Occ:-Business, Rio Plot No. 16, Durgavihar Colony, Gun Rock Enclave, Trimulghery, Secundera bad-500 015, 3.
B V Rajesh Singh, S/o Late Balkishan Singh, Occ:- Business, R/o Plot No. 16, Durgavihar Colony, Gun Rock Enclave, Trimulghery, Secunderabad-sOO 015. ... Respondents/Plaintiff Ro"\,r\c.. i 4. lVlahesh Rat+ani, S/o Ramachand Rawtani, Occ: Business, Rio. 6-3-348/8/201/A and 6-3-348/201/A, Road No. 1, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad. 5. Vijay Rawatani, S/o Mahesh Rawtani, Occ: Business, R/o. 6-3-348/8/20114 and 6-3-348120\! A, Road No. '1 , Banjara Hills, Hyderabad. ... Respondents/Defendants 2 and 3 l. A. NO: 1 OF 2014(CRPMP. NO: 1783 0F 2014) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to order stay of all further proceedings in O. S. No. 477 of 2013 on the file of the ll Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, at Hyderabad, pending disposal of the C. R. P. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI T. NATRAJ Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: SRI M. S. R. SUBRAHMANYAM Counsel for the Respondent Nos.
4 and 5: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following: ORDER HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI / CIVIL REViSION PETITION NO. 1281 0F 2014 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in this revision does not survive further adjudication and the revision has become infructuous. ln that view of the matter, recording the said submission, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending shall stand dismissed i SD/- B. SATYAVATHI I ASSISTAN T REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, Hyderabad' Chief Judge, City Civil^Court' at 1 The ll Additional Advocate onl cc to Sri T. Natraj, IoPUC] 2 Advocate [oPUC] S. R. Subrahmanvam' 3 5;; ;a i" sri ru. 4. Two CD CoPies IVl\/K &^z HIGH COURT DATED:2211212020 s? A ,(.. 1dE Z C) d tllAil2o21 n * + ORDER of 2014 CRP. No. 1281 PETITION THE CIVIL REVISION DISMISSING AS INFRUCTUOUS COSTS WITHOUT S:V " ;i c-opia5 -)-;,0\, \*-
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.