Skip to main content
LawSphereX

RAMESH KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA v. NIRUPAM BAJPAI

Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2024-02-05. RAMESH KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA v. NIRUPAM BAJPAI. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND RAMESH PHADKE th ON THE 5 OF FEBRUARY, 2024 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 2664 of 2010 BETWEEN:- RAMESH KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA S/O S/O LT. BALAL PRASAD SHRIVASTAVA , AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, OCCUPATION: GOVT. SERVICE SR. PROFESSOR,R/O 1 4 7 / 2 8 RAMASHRAYA HANUMAN COLONY,A. B. ROAD,GUNA (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... APPLICANT (none) AND NIRUPAM BAJPAI S/O , AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCCUPATION: REPORTING,R/O SHASTRI COLONY INFRONT OF PARK,GOPAL JI SAXENA KA MAKAN,GUNA (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... RESPONDENTS (none) This application coming on for direction this day, the court passed the following: ORDER The present petition u/s. 482 of Cr. P. C arises out of order dated 8. 3. 2010 passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Guna, whereby the complaint u/s. 500 of IPC for holding the present respondent guilty for defamation was rejected by the Court.

Learned Trial Court after due appreciation of material available on record and the evidence adduced therein has found that there is no sum and substance in the complaint and ingredients of Sections 499 and 500 of IPC are not Signature Not Verified Signed by: ABDUR RAHMAN Signing time: 05-Feb-24 7:15:32 PM attracted and accordingly has dismissed the said complaint. After perusing the impugned order and going through the material available on record, this Court does not find any perversity or illegality committed by the Court below in acquitting the present respondent of the charges u/s. 500 of IPC and therefore this Court holds that the order impugned since does not suffer from any perversity or illegality, has rightly been passed. Accordingly, there is no merit in the present petition, therefore the same is hereby dismissed. (MILIND RAMESH PHADKE) JUDGE ar Signature Not Verified Signed by: ABDUR RAHMAN Signing time: 05-Feb-24 7:15:32 PM

Source: High Court of Madhya Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.