SUSHIL @ SUSIL KUMAR PATRA v. STATE OF ODISHA
Court: High Court of Orissa
Bench: MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Orissa judgment dated 2026-04-09. SUSHIL @ SUSIL KUMAR PATRA v. STATE OF ODISHA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W. P. (C) No. 10556 of 2026 Sushil @ Susil Kumar Patra …. Petitioner Mr. S. K. Kar, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opposite Parties Mr. C. K. Pradhan, AGA COROM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 09. 04. 2026 Order No 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for Petitioner and learned counsel for the State-Opposite Parties. 3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:- “The above named petitioner therefore respectfully prays that Your Lordship's would graciously be pleased to admit this writ petition, issue notice to the Opp. Parties. Call for the records and after hearing both the parties quash/set aside the Office order dated 12. 06. 2025 which is under Annexure-2, taking into account the Govt. Circular Under Annexure- 5 and Circular dated 10. 10.
2025 under Annexure-6, and allow the petitioner to work at Rairangpur Sub- Jail or any near by Sub-Jail, by issuing Writ/Writs in the nature of Certiorari/Mandamus in the greater interest of justice. // 2 // And further prays that appropriate direction may issued to the OP. No. 2, to consider the case of the Petitioner by allow the representation under Annexure-8. And pass any other order(s) direction (s) as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper. And for this act of kindness the petitioner, as in duty bound shall ever pray. ” 4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner state that highlighting his grievances, the Petitioner has made a representation to Opposite Party No. 2 vide Annexure-8 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection. 5.
As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No. 2 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-8 in accordance with law within a period of three (3) months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Jyoti Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: JYOTIPRAVA BHOL Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA Date: 10-Apr-2026 14:19:23
Source: High Court of Orissa. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.