Skip to main content
LawSphereX

ASHOK KUMAR RATHI v. MANAGING DIRECTOR UTTARAKHAND TRANSPORT CORPORATION

Court: High Court of Uttarakhand

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH THAPLIYAL

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Uttarakhand judgment dated 2024-11-18. ASHOK KUMAR RATHI v. MANAGING DIRECTOR UTTARAKHAND TRANSPORT CORPORATION. Read the judgment and case...

Judgment text

2024:UHC:8535 H I GH COURT OF UTTA RA K H A N D A T N A I N I TA L H ON ’ BLE SRI JUSTI CE RA K ESH TH A PLI YA L W RI T PETI TI ON ( S/ S) N O. 2 1 6 1 OF 2 0 2 4 TH 1 8 N OVEM BER, 2 0 2 4 Ashok Kum ar Rat hi ….. Pet it ioner. Versus Ut t arakhand Transport Corporat ion & anot her …. Respondent s. Counsel for t he Pet it ioner : Mr. Gulshan Pandey, proxy counsel for Mr. Ganesh Kandpal, learned counsel. Counsel for t he Respondent s : Mr. Raj endra Arya, proxy counsel for Mr. N. S. Pundir, learned counsel. Th e Co u r t m a d e t h e f o l l o w i n g : JUD GM EN T: ( p e r H o n ’b l e Ju st i ce Sr i Ra k e sh Th a p l i y a l ) By t he inst ant writ pet it ion, t he pet it ioner is praying for t he following reliefs: - “ i- I ssue a writ , order or direct ion in t he nat ure of cert iorari t o call for t he record of case and quash im pugned pay fixat ion order dat ed 28- 8- 2021, and t he recovery order dat ed 31- 8- 2024 cont ained in Annexure no. 3 & 7 t o t his writ pet it ion.

ii- a writ , order or direct ion in t he nat ur e of m andam us dir ect ing t he r espondent s t o refund t he ent ire am ount , i. e. 200673/ - deduct ed/ recover ed from t he Ret iral dues/ Grat uit y of t he pet it ioner. ” 2. Heard learned counsel for t he part ies and perused t he record. 3. At t he very out set , learned counsel for t he 2024:UHC:8535 pet it ioner would subm it t hat t hat t he m at t er is squarely covered by t he j udgm ent dat ed 04. 04. 2024 passed by t he Division Bench of t his Court in Special Appeal No. 245 of 2022, “ Managing Direct or, Ut t arakhand Transport Corporat ion, Dehradun, vs. Ashok Kum ar Saxena & connect ed cases” . 4. Learned counsel for t he respondent- Corporat ion has not disput ed t his fact . 5. Since, t he m at t er is covered, t herefore, t he inst ant writ pet it ion is also decided in t erm s of t he j udgm ent dat ed 04. 04. 2024, passed by t he Division Bench of t his Court in Special Appeal No.

245 of 2022, “ Managing Direct or, Ut t arakhand Transport Corporat ion, Dehradun, vs. Ashok Kum ar Saxena & connect ed cases” . 6. Pending applicat ion, if any, also st ands disposed of. ’’ ( RA K ESH TH A PLI YA L, J. ) t h Dat ed: 18 Novem ber, 2024 NI SHANT Digitally signed by NISHANT KUMAR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH NISHANT COURT OF UTTARAKHAND,2. 5. 4. 20=ad3fcb5ca64340f5dd0a4c574afa0fd63133605ca57cd c00ec2b7462b452b326, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=7E81318F3B1BE7EAAC9370185F7C9C20892BC KUMAR 63A055CFD1961690560487E670C, cn=NISHANT KUMARDate: 2024. 11. 20 11:02:31 +05'30'

Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.