DR. OMPRAKASH DARA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: DINESH MEHTA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2025-01-03. DR. OMPRAKASH DARA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[2025:RJ-JD:401] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5861/2021 Dr. Sachin Choudhary S/o Choka Ram, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of Vpo Jabdi Nagar, Tehsil Nawa City, District Nagaur (Raj. ). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Additional Chief Secretary, Medical, Health And Family Welfare Services, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director (Public Health), Medical And Health Services, Health Bhawan, Jaipur. 3. The District Collector, Pratapgarh. 4. The District Health Committee, Through Its Chairman, District Collector, Pratapgarh. 5. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Pratapgarh. 6. The Block Chief Medical Officer Pipalkhunt, District Pratapgarh. 7. Medical Officer In-Charge, Primary Health Centre Kelamela, Block Pipalkhunt, District Pratapgarh. 8. The Block Chief Medical Officer Arnod, District Pratapgarh. 9.
Medical Officer In-Charge, Primary Health Centre Salamgarh, Block Arnod, District Pratapgarh. ----Respondents Connected With S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5559/2021 1. Dr. Omprakash Dara S/o Shri Mangilal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village / Post Guda Hema, Tehsil Chitalwana, District Jalore (Raj. ), Mobile No. 9413820903 2. Dr. Tarun Mali S/o Shri Jamta Ram, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village Post Dhansa, Bera Gotunadi, Tehsil Bhinmal, District Jalore (Raj. ) 3. Dr. Parsaram S/o Shri Pema Ram, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village Post Sobarawas, Tehsil Bagora, District Jalore (Raj. ) 4. Dr. Shakti Singh Sodha S/o Shri Girdhari Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Vinayak Nagar, Jaswantpura Road, [2025:RJ-JD:401] (2 of 3) [CW-5861/2021] Bhinmal, District Jalore (Raj. ) 5. Dr. Chandra Shekhar S/o Shri Babulal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Jambheshwar Nagar, Post Kaparda, Tehsil Bilara, District Jodhpur (Raj. ) ----Petitioners Versus 1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Additional Chief Secretary, Medical, Health And Family Welfare Services, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director (Public Health), Medical And Health Services, Health Bhawan, Jaipur. 3. The District Collector, Jalore. 4. The District Health Committee, Through Its Member Secretary Chief Medical And Health Officer, Jalore. 5. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Jalore. 6. The Medical Officer - Incharge, Community Health Centre, Jaswantpura, Block Jaswantpura, District Jalore. 7. The Medical Officer - Incharge, Community Health Centre, Raniwara, Block Raniwara, District Jalore. 8. The Medical Officer - Incharge, Community Heatlh Centre, Bhinmal, Block Bhinmal, District Jalore. 9. The Medical Officer - Incharge, Primary Health Centre, Guda Balotan, Block Ahore, District Jalore. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yash Pal Khileree For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sher Singh Rajpurohit for Mr. NS Rajpurohit, AAG Mr. Tanuj Jain for Mr.
Mukesh Dave, AGC JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA Order 03/01/2025 1. By way of present writ petitions, the petitioners have challenged action of the respondent No. 5-Chief Medical and Health [2025:RJ-JD:401] (3 of 3) [CW-5861/2021] Officer, Pratapgarh who has not allowed them to continuously discharge their services as Medical Officer. 2. Learned counsel submitted that a somewhat similar case (S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11235/2012: Ashok Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. ), has been disposed of by co-ordinate Bench while directing the respondents to continue the engagement of the petitioners therein until regular recruitment takes place. 3. Learned counsel prayed that similar direction be issued in this case as well. 4. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the respondents to continue the petitioners’ engagement until regular recruitment to the post of Medical Officer takes place in concerned district. 5.
The present writ petitions stand disposed of accordingly. 6. Needless to observe that in case the respondents find the petitioners to be wanting in service or being involved in any sort of misconduct, they shall be free to take appropriate proceedings in accordance with law. 7. The stay applications also stand disposed of, accordingly. (DINESH MEHTA),J 178-179-raksha/-
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.