MR. BUSHU KHAIMNIUGAN v. SHRI J. ALAM, IAS AND 3 ORS
Court: Gauhati High Court
Bench: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
Judgment date:
Case summary
Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2024-03-01. MR. BUSHU KHAIMNIUGAN v. SHRI J. ALAM, IAS AND 3 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Page No. # 1/2 GAHC020004282021 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : COP(C)/23/2021 MR. BUSHU KHAIMNIUGAN SON OF LATE WONTOJI, RESIDENCE OF CHILLISO VILLAGE, DISTRICT - NOKLAK, NAGALAND VERSUS SHRI J. ALAM, IAS AND 3 ORS THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF NAGALAND, NAGALAND, KOHIMA 2:MR KESONYU YHOME IAS THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF NAGALAND PHED NAGALAND- KOHIMA 3:ER. REPANGYANGBA LONGKUMER THE CHIEF ENGINEER PHED NAGALAND- KOHIMA 4:ER. KEDOLHOUTO PUNYU THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PHED TUENSANG DIVISION- NAGALAND 5:SHRI. E. MHONBEMO PATTON PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF NAGALAND PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT(PHED) NAGALAND KOHIM Advocate for the Petitioner : L LIKHASE SANGTAM Advocate for the Respondent : Page No. # 2/2 BEFORE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER Date : 01-03-2024 Heard learned counsel Mr. Bennison V. Shohe for the petitioner and Ms. V.
Suokhrie, learned AAG for the respondent No. 2 and learned counsel Mr. N. Angami for respondent No. 1. The petitioner Mr. Bushu Khaimniugan has filed this application u/s 12 and 13 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India for wilful and deliberate violation of the Court’s order dated 05. 02. 2021 passed in W. P. (C) No. 77(K)/2021. It is contended that the respondents were aware of the direction contained in the afore-mentioned order. However, they have deliberately ignored and wilfully disobeyed the direction of this Court. Today, the learned AAG for the respondents has submitted that the Government has complied with the order of this Court and the order dated 21. 02. 2024 in connection with the order No. CE/PHE/EST-WC/R-30/2016 indicates that a post has been created for the petitioner who is a Worked Charged Employee for his regularisation. The learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection as the order has been complied with.
The matter is closed. Sd/- JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: Gauhati High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.